The primary focus of the meeting was the proposal for the ADU on Fifth Avenue. Initially, the plan included more extensive modifications such as a back extension and a front balcony. However, these elements were removed after receiving feedback from the board during the August meeting. The revised proposal centered exclusively on the ADU, reducing the number of required variances from five to two, specifically concerning rear and side setbacks. The proposed setbacks were slightly less than required—2 feet instead of 3 for the rear, and 2.2 feet instead of 5 for the side. Architect Jonathan Wolf, representing the applicant, emphasized that these discrepancies were minor and in line with neighboring structures.

One of the discussion points revolved around the impact of the ADU on parking and the neighborhood’s character. The applicant assured the board that the existing shared driveway could accommodate the three required parking spaces for the ADU. Aerial photos were provided to illustrate current conditions, and Wolf highlighted that the garage was underutilized and could serve a greater purpose if converted into an ADU. Despite these assurances, there were concerns about the appropriateness of increasing the dwelling’s height and density in a predominantly one-story area.

Throughout the review process, board members scrutinized the design and functionality of the proposed ADU. They expressed concerns about the consistency of the building’s design, particularly regarding window patterns. The design team acknowledged past inconsistencies and confirmed their commitment to achieving uniformity in the street-facing facades. The structure would consist of two floors and a loft, with the latter intended primarily for storage due to its limited ceiling height.

The mechanical layout of the ADU also attracted attention. Utilities such as water, gas, and electricity would be sourced from the main house, and a mini-split system was proposed for heating and cooling. The placement of the condenser unit became a subject of debate, with suggestions to position it where space allowed. While the current drainage system was deemed effective, there was an openness to exploring improvements, particularly to increase permeable surfaces on the largely concrete lot.

Setbacks and proximity to property lines were other issues raised during the meeting. A board member expressed unease regarding the 2.5-foot setback but noted that the current conditions were already established, and neighboring properties had adapted. The board deliberated on the minimal and manageable nature of the ADU’s impact on surrounding properties, ultimately finding the revised proposal improved and aligned with zoning regulations.

As deliberations concluded, board members commended the applicant for returning with a refined proposal and acknowledged the challenges posed by zoning constraints on smaller properties. The board’s decision to approve the ADU was contingent upon the engineer’s review of stormwater management and mechanical placements. The motion to approve was seconded, and the board members present voted unanimously in favor.

While the approval of the ADU on Fifth Avenue was the primary focus, the meeting began with the board addressing resolutions for other properties. The applications for a property on Sunset Drive and Drummond Avenue were approved unanimously without the need for extensive discussion.