02:01The meeting was designated as an educational session, led by presenters Jack and Donna, focusing on the board’s decision-making processes and the evaluation of zoning applications. A key discussion point was the 2021 zoning regulation changes influenced by a 2017 master plan re-examination. The presenters emphasized the evolving nature of land use policies and the need for board members to remain informed.

50:58Another topic was the recent revision allowing for garages to be situated closer to the front of properties, a departure from previous practices. This ordinance aimed to balance modern convenience with the town’s architectural character, mandating that garage openings be set back at least five feet from the front building line. Discussion revealed concerns over how these changes were communicated to board members, with one member expressing surprise by stating, “I stumbled into the garage fiasco.” The board agreed on the need for better communication and education on zoning changes to ensure informed decision-making.

20:20The meeting also delved into the complexities of zoning variances, particularly in urban settings where non-conforming uses and property conversions are common. The board discussed the criteria for granting variances, distinguishing between hardship variances (C1 and C2) and the necessity to ensure no substantial detriment to the public good. The speaker clarified that personal hardships do not constitute legal grounds for variances, emphasizing the need for objective evidence to support variance applications. This was highlighted by the statement, “the hardship is not defined as well I have a personal hardship.”

01:01:20Additionally, the meeting addressed the challenges of zoning enforcement and non-conforming uses in Asbury Park. A speaker noted the inadequate resources allocated to zoning enforcement, with only “half of an employee” dedicated to this task, complicating the enforcement of zoning laws. There was a historical context provided, revealing longstanding policies on non-conforming uses and the need for evidence of use prior to zoning laws. The board emphasized rigorous standards for variance approval, stressing the importance of credible evidence to navigate the cycle of applications often seen due to ordinance violations.

01:23:26The intricacies of accessory dwelling units (ADUs) were also discussed, with the meeting clarifying that ADUs would not require board approval unless they encroach on existing zoning laws. Concerns were raised about the lack of an appeals mechanism for ADU decisions, highlighting a perceived gap in the ordinance.