Janet and Michael Field presented their vision for the development, which includes 59 housing units with a mix of single-family homes and multi-family units. The Fields emphasized their collaboration with architects and civil engineers to align the development with community needs, incorporating features such as outdoor patios to enhance livability. The layout is designed to accommodate diverse housing types, including duplexes and larger buildings, all while adhering to state guidelines for affordable housing.

A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to discussing the environmental and infrastructural challenges posed by the development. Board members raised questions about the distribution of unit types, the structure of ownership under a Homeowners Association (HOA), and the project’s sustainability features. It was confirmed that the buildings would be solar-ready and equipped with energy-efficient systems. Concerns over access and traffic flow emerged, particularly regarding the development’s sole entry point from High Street and the absence of a connection from Groton Harvard Road. A traffic study is underway to evaluate the need for a secondary access point to enhance safety.

The Stratton Hill proposal, another multifamily housing development, also featured prominently in the meeting. The yield plan, which initially allowed for up to 91 units, was adjusted to 81 to respect open space regulations. Discussions with the Fire Department and Public Works Department are ongoing to address infrastructure concerns, including stormwater management and lift station requirements.

Concerns about existing utilities and stormwater management were debated. The board underscored the risks associated with reusing 20-year-old utilities, resulting in a motion to mandate new installations. This decision was driven by previous issues with drainage capacity and the need for updated infrastructure to support the development. Testing methods for stormwater infiltration were scrutinized, with a preference for traditional percolation tests over laboratory soil analyses to ensure accuracy.

The meeting also addressed the necessity of a trail easement and the implications for existing trails within the development area. There was debate over the legal requirements for easements and the safety concerns posed by hunters using the trail. Additionally, the board discussed technical conditions of approval, including the need for comprehensive water usage and sewer flow reports as part of the application process.

As the meeting drew to a close, scheduling for future discussions became a topic of concern. The board acknowledged the constraints imposed by the Conservation Commission’s timeline and the need for review processes before moving forward.