The site evaluation for the proposed senior center garnered considerable discussion among the board members, who weighed various factors such as location, utilities, traffic, and the natural environment. The board decided to remove one of the three sites from consideration, highlighting concerns over the cost implications of utilities. The remaining sites, Bishop Road and Harvard Road, are still being evaluated, with ongoing discussions about the need to conduct soil tests to assess conditions such as the water table and the importance of public input in the development process.

The design and layout of the senior center itself were also central to the meeting’s agenda. Detailed deliberations took place regarding the size and features of different rooms, including bathrooms, a kitchen, and fitness facilities. The board highlighted the need for larger bathrooms with enhanced accessibility and storage for medical equipment. A commercial kitchen with a walk-in freezer was discussed to serve daily meals to potentially up to 125 people during special events.

The fitness room was a particular point of focus, with conversations around the number and types of equipment needed, ensuring safety features such as railing systems on treadmills, and the importance of visiting other centers for ideas. The board also considered the need for quiet spaces such as a lounge and library, emphasizing their importance for the senior community.

Another topic of discussion was the draft program for the senior center, which included a analysis of the layout and features of the proposed building. An energy recovery unit was considered as part of an energy-efficient design. Adjustments to the draft program were proposed, such as adding medical equipment storage and reconfiguring spaces to include additional classrooms and offices instead of a conference room.

The meeting addressed the utilization of space, with a focus on activities like card playing and puzzles, and the importance of flexible room layouts to accommodate various recreational pursuits. The board discussed the need to finalize and approve the draft program to proceed with further steps. The size of the building was debated as an essential factor, particularly since it would affect cost estimates and the number of parking spaces required, which was suggested to be at least 100.

Public engagement was also a topic of concern. The board acknowledged the need for outreach and input on the senior center’s development. Upcoming bridge construction on West Main Street, which could impact traffic, was mentioned, along with strategies for public opinion gathering. The board also expressed interest in incorporating outdoor spaces for gardening.

Public comments during the meeting brought up issues such as odors at the Harvard Road site and requests for the draft program to be made available for community review. The meeting concluded with the scheduling of the next meeting for June 26th.