The meeting opened with a analysis of utility costs for potential building sites, which informed the board’s discussions about the feasibility of various locations for the senior center. The board considered the estimated costs for water connections and the necessity of a six-inch line to accommodate a sprinkler system. Furthermore, they explored the potential need for a force main to connect to the sewer lines due to shallow slopes and the challenges posed by the existing infrastructure. The possibility of using a septic system or a well as alternatives to municipal services was also discussed, including the complexities of testing and ensuring the safety of a public well.

Members weighed the potential risks and benefits of these options, considering factors such as the cost-effectiveness and viability of septic systems, directional drilling, and alternative water sources. The discussions also addressed concerns about potential contamination from nearby sites and the need for comprehensive testing to ensure the proposed utility connections would be safe and sustainable.

The debate extended to the planning and design aspects of the senior center. The board debated the layout and usage of the multi-purpose room, the necessity of features like showers and sinks, and the placement of stairs and mechanical rooms for elevators. The discussion stressed the importance of sound control with acoustic paneling and the potential for outdoor activities like pickleball courts. A contentious topic was the room size and purpose of the fitness room, along with the cost implications of fitness equipment and the option of charging for its use.

Design considerations such as the use of glass walls, sound insulation, and the architectural response to activities like pickleball were discussed, emphasizing the need to balance visibility with privacy and distraction concerns. The board also deliberated on the best methods of community engagement to gather input on the building design and proposed amenities, including billiards, indoor pickleball, and ax throwing.

The discussion of activities and facilities at the senior center was another focal point of the meeting. Board members considered a range of offerings such as arts and crafts, sewing, knitting, pottery, woodworking, and exercise, highlighting the need to consult seniors on their preferences. The board reviewed outreach efforts, including newsletters and social media engagement.

The financial aspects of the senior center project were examined, including funding sources and borrowing procedures. Environmental concerns were also addressed, particularly the potential impact of development on the Bishop Road area and contamination issues at West Main Street. The board acknowledged the importance of thorough environmental testing and analysis to assess the viability of the sites.

As the meeting concluded, the board planned to evaluate both proposed sites further, considering the feasibility of each option. The next steps included conducting test pits at potential sites to understand the soils and water table, and reviewing draft floor plans for the senior center.