A significant portion of the meeting was devoted to discussing the proposal for a new senior center. The proposed facility, to be located on Bishop Road, is designed to better meet the needs of Ayer’s growing senior population, which makes up around 25% of the town’s residents. Current facilities, housed in a 1,700-square-foot basement, are criticized for their lack of accessibility and inadequate space to accommodate the increasing demand for senior programs and services.

The new center’s features include flexible programming spaces, a commercial kitchen, and lounge areas, designed with accessibility in mind. The expansion is seen as a necessary investment to provide a dignified environment for older adults, offering amenities such as arts and crafts areas, fitness spaces, and private consultation rooms for social services. The design considers safety for those with mobility and vision impairments, incorporating elements like wayfinding flooring and noise-reducing ceilings.

Financial implications were a componet of the discussion, with the total project cost estimated at $15.1 million. The town plans to fund the project through a combination of borrowing and capital stabilization funds. The senior center is expected to require a two-thirds vote at the town meeting and a simple majority in a subsequent ballot election for approval. The town manager projected that borrowing approximately $10 million over 25 years would impact the average residential tax bill by about $143 annually.

Community members voiced various opinions on the proposal. Some supported the expansion, citing it as a vital investment for future generations and stressing the need for updated facilities. They argued that neighboring towns have already expanded their senior centers, leaving Ayer at a comparative disadvantage. Testimonials highlighted the center’s importance in providing community and support for seniors, with one participant noting the quality of lunches and the supportive community.

However, concerns were raised regarding the project’s size and associated financial burden. Some residents questioned whether the proposed 13,000 square feet were necessary. Others were worried about the potential tax increases, with one finance committee member estimating a $473 increase for the median household when considering the overall budget increase. There were calls for alternative proposals, such as phased construction or different designs, to allow for more informed decision-making regarding costs and tax implications.

Environmental concerns were also addressed, particularly regarding the proposed site’s habitat for endangered species. The committee assured that steps would be taken to comply with environmental regulations and mitigate any negative impact.

In parallel to the senior center discussions, the committee deliberated on proposed changes to zoning bylaws, particularly those related to density bonuses and affordable housing in Open Space Residential Developments (OSRD). The amendments aim to clarify existing regulations, remove outdated provisions, and streamline processes for developers seeking density bonuses.

Concerns were raised about ensuring adequate protections for residents, with suggestions to include language that considers geological interests and impacts on neighbors. Legal counsel advised caution, emphasizing the need for clear zoning articles to avoid vagueness that could impede development.

The proposed zoning changes, including amendments to the off-street parking requirements in the downtown area, were eventually passed by a two-thirds majority. The parking amendment aims to reduce the requirement from one space per residential unit to half a space, promoting shared parking agreements and facilitating development.