The most significant portion of the meeting revolved around the continuation of a public hearing involving Plat Builders’ application for a variance to construct a pole barn on their property for equipment storage. The applicant discussed their interaction with the MBTA concerning setback requirements and the challenges faced by the unique shape of their lot. The conversation extended to the need for a more permanent storage solution over the use of temporary storage containers. The board members and town planner voiced concerns about the impact of granting a temporary variance, particularly how it might affect neighboring properties and set a precedent for similar cases along the same corridor.

A key point of contention was the MBTA’s firm opposition to any permanent structures that would encroach upon the established setback requirements. The applicant argued for the necessity of an indoor storage facility to protect their equipment from weather conditions, highlighting ongoing efforts to minimize the number of storage contracts currently in use.

The board also deliberated on the proposal to use a pole barn on Central Avenue temporarily. Concerns were raised regarding the barn’s proximity to the property line, the absence of 360-degree access around the building, and the potential impact on the area’s visual appeal. After a discussion, the board voted to accept the withdrawal of the application without prejudice, which means the applicant could potentially resubmit the application in the future without any negative implications from the current withdrawal.

In addition to the pole barn variance issue, the meeting touched upon the election of board officers, specifically the positions of chair and vice-chair. A discussion ensued about whether to modify the selection process for these roles annually, considering the possible impact of new board members with different strengths joining the board. Despite some concerns, the board ultimately decided to maintain the current methodology for selecting its leadership.

Further administrative matters included the approval of the minutes from a previous meeting, with minor amendments suggested and implemented to correct dates and typographical errors. The board also examined sample decisions, debating the appropriate level of detail that should be included in such documents. While some members advocated for more detailed decisions for future reference, others suggested that existing details might be excessive.

The accessibility of meeting videos and transcripts for members unable to attend was also discussed. The board considered the use of a document for absent members to acknowledge the review of these materials.