The meeting also addressed broader concerns about buildings constructed within the FEMA flood zone at two specific properties. The Lake Management Committee had raised alarms regarding these structures, fearing they could obstruct critical waterways and exacerbate flooding risks during severe weather events. This concern is rooted in historical flooding events, notably Hurricane Diane, which had caused considerable damage in the past. The committee has been collaborating with the USDA’s Natural Resource Conservation Service on flood restoration plans for Canal Brook and Great Brook, and the debate at the meeting centered on whether the town’s building inspection and conservation board should revisit already-granted permits for these buildings, particularly those involving new handicapped ramps.

The discussion reflected differing perspectives, with some members asserting the buildings were properly constructed above the floodplain, while others expressed apprehension over potential flood risks. The Commission also reviewed a letter concerning previous construction activities and compliance with issued permits. It was noted that a certificate of compliance had already been issued, and new installations would require a Request for Determination of Applicability (RDA). Despite this, there were concerns about ongoing construction activities that seemed to violate previous cease-and-desist orders. Members expressed frustration over non-compliance with regulations, emphasizing the need for the town to enforce stormwater management by-laws and for further follow-up on the status of cease-and-desist orders.

Another topic was the removal of a dead tree on the North Pond Conservation Property. The process faced complications due to concerns about potentially damaging a neighbor’s septic pipe. Two options were considered: using a smaller machine that would require cutting saplings for access, or using crane mats to ensure safe removal. The Commission weighed the potential environmental impacts and the need for professional guidance on managing the tree removal safely.

The meeting also touched on ongoing issues with the North Pond conservation area and the lack of updates on the pointing plan for the area. The open space committee had held its first meeting, but no developments were reported. Additionally, questions were raised about the conservation coordinator’s report concerning a community inquiry on hunting regulations on the Starret Drive conservation property. It was clarified that state regulations on hunting near residences and structures must be followed.

The Southwick Conservation Commission also addressed correspondence from the Lake Management Committee, which had expressed concerns about flood zone constructions. The dialogue included reflections on past flooding events, emphasizing that various factors, not just rainfall, contributed to historical flooding problems in the area. Members acknowledged improvements over time but remained vigilant about future risks.

In the course of the meeting, a letter from Richard was introduced, detailing corrective actions for a property where over three acres of forested land had been cleared, exceeding the town’s limit for such activities. The Lake Management Committee advocated for the removal of unpermitted dams and restoration of the stream bed. Members voiced their dissatisfaction with the lack of compliance and the need for the town to ensure adherence to environmental regulations.