Tigerclaw’s application outlined several proposed changes to the site, such as updates to lighting, removal of some impervious cover, addition of striping to the parking area, and landscaping installations. A major component of the proposal involved addressing the non-conforming status of the property, which necessitated variances due to its current layout and proposed modifications. The board scrutinized parking arrangements, particularly spaces located within setback areas, debating whether reducing these spaces would aid in complying with zoning requirements.

A key point of contention was the placement of a substantial electrical box needed for the charging stations, which posed potential visual and regulatory challenges. The board was keen to ensure that its location would not obstruct traffic or require additional variances, with suggestions made for collaborative placement planning. There was also a proposal to situate the transformer behind the charging stations, far enough from the road to avoid visibility issues.

The board’s deliberations also focused on the traffic circulation around the gas station, which is situated at a busy intersection. Members highlighted the hazards posed by current entrance and exit configurations, which have led to near-accidents. The relocation of the EV charging stations was seen as a favorable step, pushing them back from the entrance to reduce potential conflicts. Recommendations were made for clearer directional signage and pavement markings to guide vehicles safely through the site. However, board members acknowledged the limitations of their authority over the driveways, as these fall under county and state jurisdiction.

The convenience store, which would be an accessory use to the gas station, also prompted discussion. Tigerclaw assured the board that the store would remain focused on selling pre-packaged goods, without any food preparation that might complicate operations. Concerns about misuse of the store space for third-party storage were addressed by emphasizing that the retail use was compliant with zoning regulations. The store’s operations, primarily managed by a single attendant, would coincide with the gas station’s hours.

Environmental considerations were also part of the discussions, given the site’s history of contamination due to past spills. The board was informed that the site is under ongoing remediation, with annual monitoring and testing of wells to ensure safety. This environmental status adds an extra layer of complexity to the site’s management and potential modifications.

Ultimately, the board considered approval conditions that included granting a D1 variance for the convenience store, limiting its offerings to packaged goods, and stipulating site improvements like landscaping and building exterior upgrades. These conditions aimed to balance regulatory compliance with the enhancement of customer service and site aesthetics.