0:05One notable issue discussed was the township’s compliance with state affordable housing requirements. A speaker presented an overview of ongoing compliance efforts, explaining that Bedminster is required to provide 72 affordable housing units. This obligation includes a stipulation that at least 25% of these units must be rentals, with half designated as family rentals. The speaker detailed the township’s relatively favorable position compared to others, having managed to agree on this number without significant challenges from the Fair Share Housing Center.

The conversation touched on the historical context of housing obligations, referencing past litigation that resulted in overestimation of required units and underscoring the potential negative impact of miscalculations. The board was reminded of the deadline to adopt a housing element and fair share plan by June 30th, emphasizing the need for preparedness and thorough documentation.

The discussion on affordable housing transitioned to the board’s alignment with state development and planning policies. The township has historically aligned well with state objectives, and the board plans to continue renewing plan endorsements to maintain this alignment. The speaker offered to assist in drafting responses to state inquiries.

15:59Another major topic of discussion was an application by bde Holdings LLC to convert a former bridal dress boutique into a high-end retail kitchen and bath design studio, with a two-bedroom apartment above. The board reviewed the necessary variances, including those related to floor area ratio and lot coverage, due to the lot’s pre-existing non-conformities. The attorney for the applicant outlined the variances required, noting that Somerset County had already approved the application, following proper notification procedures.

Heddy Coleman, one of the business owners, described the proposed design studio as appointment-only, with minimal foot traffic. She emphasized the personalized nature of the business, which involves direct deliveries from the factory to clients’ homes. The board discussed the layout of the building, noting that there were no separate entrances for the apartment, which prompted inquiries into the design and use of the space.

The board’s deliberations on the project involved weighing the benefits of the development against the need to adhere to zoning laws. A professional planner is expected to provide detailed evidence to support the variances sought.

32:43Additionally, the board examined a project on Main Street, located within the DN Village neighborhood zone. The property is undersized and does not comply with several zoning requirements, which necessitates a series of variances. The project involves renovations to the second floor, including the installation of two bedrooms and modifications to improve accessibility, such as an ADA-accessible lift. The board discussed the proposed increase in lot coverage, which remains below the previously approved maximum.

1:13:26The meeting also covered a project on Oakill Avenue, Long Branch, where the speaker recommended acceptance based on its alignment with town objectives. This proposal involves utilizing an existing historic structure for a permitted use under current zoning regulations. The project aims to enhance safety and accessibility with minimal impact on the property’s footprint, which includes a stairway for a second means of egress.