Belmar Zoning Board Approves Key Variances Amid Concerns Over Zoning Compliance and Safety

The Belmar Zoning Board’s recent meeting tackled multiple applications, focusing on zoning compliance, safety, and community integration. Among the discussions, the board approved variances for a garage-to-pool house conversion, deliberated over a complex residential addition with FAR concerns, and navigated the intricacies of a proposed expansive dwelling height.

00:45The most notable discussion centered around the application regarding TCO 2133 Avenue, which initially sought to convert a garage into a secondary dwelling unit for an individual with special medical needs. During deliberations, board members raised concerns about zoning compliance and the potential implications of establishing an additional dwelling unit on the site. Consequently, the application was modified to convert the garage into a pool house instead. This new proposal was seen as a less intensive use and more in line with zoning regulations.

The two-story nature of the garage posed a challenge, as pool house ordinances permit only one-story structures. Despite this, the board hesitated to require demolition. Instead, they focused on variances required for height and setback, as the property already exceeded building coverage limits. Additionally, the board debated whether heating installations could be allowed, given their typical prohibition, eventually agreeing they might be necessary for energy code compliance. Conditions for approval included a prohibition on cooking facilities, limiting the second story to storage, and ensuring any air conditioning system was compliant in location. The board was explicit in its intent to prevent the pool house from serving as a living unit, emphasizing that the larger sewer line to be installed would be reviewed by the borough engineer.

23:32The board also tackled an application involving a significant residential expansion, where Jay Donovan and Michelle Buzy sought to enhance their existing home on Avenue. Their proposal included adding to the existing structure, which presented challenges due to the lot’s substandard size and unusual structural features. The proposed expansion would increase building coverage, sparking concerns about compliance with zoning laws. However, it also aimed to improve the property’s impervious surface management by redesigning the driveway with permeable materials.

36:32The board engaged in a detailed deliberation over the requested variances, especially the floor area ratio, which exceeded the allowable limit. The applicants and their architect emphasized the need for these changes to enhance livability while maintaining the neighborhood’s aesthetic harmony.

15:15Safety concerns were a major discussion point in the application for Carrera 503 12th Avenue. The proposed project involved converting a two-family home into a single-family dwelling with an attached pool and garage. The board scrutinized the legal standards and zoning regulations to ensure that the modifications did not permit the rear structure to function as a separate living unit. Conditions for approval included ensuring landscaping and coverage limits were adhered to, and that the garage was distinctly partitioned from living spaces.

45:57Additionally, the board reviewed an ambitious proposal that featured an increase in structure height from 32.5 feet to 80 feet. This raised fire safety concerns, particularly due to the proximity of neighboring houses. The application required a D variance due to the proposed floor area ratio exceeding the allowable limit. Despite the variance request being minor, board members expressed concerns about the implications of exceeding zoning limits and suggested the applicants consider reducing the building size to alleviate compliance issues.

01:37:07The meeting also addressed the proposal to modify an existing property to include a more conforming addition to a single-family home situated on an undersized lot. The application involved several variances, including for building coverage and setbacks. The applicant’s team stressed the need for modernization, citing inadequate living conditions in the existing structure. Their plan included a second floor addition, new garage, and a fourth bedroom, all while maintaining the neighborhood’s character.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: