A major focus of the meeting was the adoption of Ordinance Number 496, designed to regulate cannabis and lower-potency hemp edible businesses in Benton County. This ordinance, crafted with input from various departments like the Sheriff’s Office and public health, aligns with Minnesota statutes and draft rules from the Office of Cannabis Management. It includes provisions allowing cities to set retail sales hours, while the county itself will regulate temporary cannabis events outside city limits. Enforcement will fall under the Sheriff’s Department and public health officials, with civil penalties and an appeals process for violations included. The ordinance sets a cap of four cannabis operations across the county, with local limitations based on population size. This population-based approach spurred discussions on fairness and equitable access to cannabis business opportunities. The cap and local restrictions were designed to prevent an over-concentration of businesses in any single jurisdiction.

The ordinance also outlines operational criteria for cannabis businesses, such as prohibiting operations near schools and daycare facilities. Retail hours are set from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., but cities can impose stricter regulations. Temporary cannabis events will be regulated outside city limits, while cities handle their own events, with prohibitions on on-site consumption and overnight camping. A suggestion was made to allow the county to establish its own cannabis retail operation, which would not count against the established cap.

The board also addressed frustrations with Excel Energy over delays impacting the Casassa 29 and Casassa 1 projects. Delivery of materials for these projects is not expected until August 2025, potentially delaying them beyond federal funding requirements. The board expressed frustration over the lack of progress despite repeated communications with Excel. Discussions included potential recourse for incurred costs due to delays, as the county had already paid for preliminary work. Safety concerns were emphasized due to the extended timeline, which could exacerbate risks associated with these infrastructure projects.

A discussion unfolded about engaging a lobbying firm, Lin Hoffman, to represent Benton County at the state level. The firm proposed a contract for state representation at $48,000 annually and federal representation for an additional $42,000. Commissioners debated the effectiveness of a short-term contract, with some suggesting a longer engagement might yield better results. The potential benefits of consistent advocacy at the capital were stressed, particularly for infrastructure funding amid regional growth. The board agreed to table the decision until the next meeting, considering a potential two-year contract to secure a fixed rate and mitigate costs.

The board also reviewed their pursuit of federal funding through the RAISE grant program for a transportation project. Although the project was initially highly ranked, it faced challenges in the benefit-cost ratio evaluation, leading to a non-recommendation for funding. A consultant suggested scaling back the project for future feasibility, focusing on specific improvements like roundabouts rather than a costly four-lane urban boulevard. The board showed interest in reapplying, emphasizing collaboration with local entities like the City of Sauk Rapids to share redesign costs.

Additional discussions covered a pedestrian crossing project with the City of Rice, highlighting reimbursement for administrative costs incurred by the county. The board debated past agreements and the consistency of policy applications, noting the need for clear documentation on financial obligations. They also discussed supporting a Transportation Alternative Grant for a trail project in Sock Rapids, emphasizing that future construction should not interfere with county right-of-way to avoid additional costs.