A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to addressing concerns from residents over recent tax increases and the financial management of the county’s projects. Residents expressed dissatisfaction, highlighting what they perceived as disproportionate commissioner salaries and costly projects like the “Taj Mahal” construction and the airport deal. One resident criticized these decisions.

The airport project, in particular, was a focal point of contention. The board defended the airport’s role as a regional asset, citing its potential to become self-sustaining and contribute to the local economy. A speaker emphasized that users would cover the majority of the airport’s costs. Despite these assurances, residents remained skeptical, questioning the transparency and accountability of the board’s decisions.

The divide in perspectives underscored ongoing concerns about governance and community welfare.

In addition to the airport controversy, the board discussed the reauthorization of a local sales tax dedicated to transportation projects. The tax, originally projected to generate $1.9 million annually, has exceeded expectations, bringing in $3.5 to $3.8 million. The board emphasized that a portion of this revenue comes from non-residents, alleviating some of the burden on local taxpayers. The funds are earmarked for road and bridge projects, with a map presented at the meeting outlining completed and proposed projects.

Residents voiced their opinions during the public hearing on the sales tax initiative. Supporters highlighted the tax’s role in improving county roads, while others called for specific projects to be prioritized, such as the paving of certain county roads that have long been neglected.

The meeting also covered procedural topics, including fee schedule adjustments and the approval of the 2026 budget and levy. The board unanimously approved the final certified levy and the 2026 budget, which included a decision to maintain current salaries for elected officials and county commissioners. The board also addressed per diem payments, clarifying that they do not apply to regular board meetings.

Additionally, the board discussed the possibility of engaging a lobbying firm to advocate for Benton County’s needs at the federal level. The proposal, which involves a per capita funding approach, aims to secure federal funding for local projects, particularly in light of recent fatalities at local intersections. The board emphasized the urgency of securing funds before legislative sessions commence, acknowledging bipartisan support from local legislators.

Public health and emergency management representatives presented their efforts to enhance community safety and resilience, highlighting joint projects and training exercises. The board expressed a commitment to fostering a supportive environment for employees, proposing initiatives like “coffee with commissioners” to encourage dialogue and engagement.