22:57A key topic of the meeting was the detailed presentation on the referendum process, which aims to address infrastructure needs, such as roof repairs, boiler replacements, and window upgrades. While these improvements are important for school operations, they may not easily garner public support due to their low visibility. Therefore, the discussion highlighted the importance of including high-visual-impact projects like Media Centers and Maker Spaces to enhance learning environments and attract community interest. An emphasis was placed on a balanced approach that caters to athletics, instruction, and the arts.

0:28Financial implications were thoroughly examined, with a particular focus on the district’s current debt and its maturity timeline. The existing bond is set to mature in 2026, presenting an opportunity to introduce a new referendum without causing a significant tax increase. The board discussed strategies for replacing expiring debt with new projects, leveraging Debt Service Aid to minimize tax impacts. It was noted that previous successful referenda and the district’s strong credit rating position Berkeley Heights favorably for future bond sales, potentially resulting in lower interest rates.

22:57Community engagement emerged as an important element in the referendum planning process. Surveys conducted via Google forms have shown community support for STEM and STEAM initiatives, as well as building improvements. However, some projects, like paving, received moderate backing. The board emphasized the need for transparent communication with the community about the costs and benefits of proposed projects, including the potential receipt of up to 34% state aid for eligible initiatives. This aid could reduce the financial burden on the district.

0:28The board also discussed the importance of timing the referendum to coincide with high-success months like March or September, based on historical data. Social media engagement and local news partnerships are planned to inform and involve the community actively. The timeline for these efforts includes boosting social media posts and distributing informational brochures during key school events to ensure widespread awareness of the referendum’s objectives and benefits.

39:20Additionally, the board addressed the costs of conducting a special election, estimated at around $30,000, and clarified that these expenses would be part of the referendum budget, with potential eligibility for aid on associated costs. The distinction between using public funds for advocacy and personal endorsement by board members was clarified.

1:30:17The potential for solar and energy efficiency projects was also discussed, with advocates highlighting existing savings from current solar initiatives and the environmental benefits of expanding such projects. The board was urged to consider the inclusion of solar systems in the referendum, particularly given the upcoming expiration of existing power purchase agreements. The consultant noted that roofing improvements, a necessary precursor for solar installations, could be financed through the referendum, allowing the district to pursue energy-efficient upgrades in the future.

The board recognized the importance of clearly communicating the distinction between the district’s annual operating budget and the capital projects funded by a referendum. By ensuring community members understand how funds are managed and allocated, the board aims to build confidence and support for the referendum, ultimately facilitating the approval of essential school improvements.