The discussion on inclusive education highlighted the district’s ongoing efforts to enhance opportunities for students with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs). The board emphasized the legal framework requiring that students with IEPs be educated in the least restrictive environment possible. This commitment is part of a broader state initiative to improve inclusion rates, an area where New Jersey ranks low nationally. The district reported progress, with a notable increase in the percentage of students with IEPs participating in general education settings, rising from 68% to 85%. The board also discussed the co-teaching model, which has been instrumental in supporting students within inclusive classrooms, and the need for continued professional development to foster collaboration between general and special education teachers.

Programs such as “Feelgood Fridays” and “Wellness Wednesdays” were introduced to promote emotional well-being and positive interactions among students. The “Zones of Regulation” framework is being used to help students manage emotions, and the district is implementing various themed activities to engage students and foster a supportive school environment.

Student assessments were another focal point, particularly the NJSLA results. The board reviewed data indicating that while Berkeley Heights students performed above state averages in English language arts and mathematics, science scores remained an area of concern. The Acting Superintendent presented a analysis of the district’s performance, highlighting a higher percentage of students meeting or exceeding expectations compared to state averages. However, the results also revealed challenges in specialized programs, particularly for English Language Learners (ELLs) facing difficulties with science assessments due to language barriers. The board discussed strategies to address these challenges, including revising course offerings and enhancing instruction in science to align with Next Generation Science Standards.

A significant part of the meeting was dedicated to policy revisions. The board deliberated various updates, including policies on co-curricular activities, electronic communication devices, and student participation in board meetings. A contentious discussion emerged around a policy permitting board member participation via electronic devices, which some members felt conflicted with the integrity of traditional meeting practices. The board also addressed revisions to policies concerning service animals, suicide prevention, and emergency situations.

In the public comment section, residents raised concerns about the superintendent search process and student behavior in the community. The board responded by emphasizing the confidentiality of the selection process and acknowledging the importance of educating students on community respect.