0:00The most prominent issue on the agenda was the application from First Student seeking a deadline extension for conducting a required traffic study at their school bus depot on Russo Place. The applicant’s representative, Michael Al, explained that delays were due to ongoing negotiations with the property owner and compliance challenges with NJ Department of Environmental Protection regulations. Although site work began on June 28, 2024, completion was only expected by November 8, 2024, with the site not yet operating at full capacity. Consequently, the board unanimously approved an extension for the traffic study deadline to October 31, 2026.

During the review, board members inquired about the current operational capacity of the depot, which is permitted to host up to 40 buses but is presently accommodating 25 due to ongoing construction. Temporary bus parking arrangements, including at a local swimming club, were discussed, though the applicant could not confirm the necessary permits for these arrangements. The rationale for the two-year extension was linked to the need for comprehensive data collection over two school cycles, despite some board members questioning whether a single cycle would suffice. Traffic compliance issues, particularly concerning left-hand turns from the depot, were also reaffirmed as part of the conditions for approval.

33:09Another topic was the expansion project on Overhill, where discussions focused on stormwater runoff, property boundaries, and the implications of excessive lot coverage. Concerns were raised regarding the proposed patio and barbecue area, prompting a call for reduced coverage to less than 30%. Richard Ler from the environmental commission emphasized the necessity of stormwater management, advocating for green infrastructure solutions. A resident, identified as Jim M, expressed grievances about perceived encroachments onto his property, particularly regarding tree removal and improper drainage swale adjustments. His concerns highlighted potential breaches of zoning codes and inadequate oversight of the approval process.

Public comments underscored the contentious nature of the property boundary and drainage issues, with calls for further investigation and documentation.

1:57:27In addition, the board tackled various applications involving driveway expansions and the accompanying zoning implications. A detailed examination of a property on Liberty Avenue revealed that the driveway exceeded permissible limits, leading to a proposal for a reduction in width. Environmental considerations, such as potential impacts on nearby trees and increased stormwater runoff, were also debated. The board ultimately approved the driveway alterations with conditions, including obtaining necessary permits and adhering to specific dimensions.

1:22:34During the meeting, the board also heard a residential expansion application on a corner lot, where the applicant sought to transform their home to accommodate their growing family. Discussions touched on non-conforming front yard setbacks and driveway safety, with board members suggesting driveway access modifications to improve neighborhood safety. Although the driveway expansion did not require variance relief, it was an essential consideration for the board, highlighting the intricate nature of zoning decisions that involve neighborhood dynamics and safety.