One of the critical applications addressed was for the Cola residence on Deepdale Drive. The homeowner sought a variance for a shed installation, which sparked a conversation about the proposed location and environmental considerations. The board and the homeowner explored several options, including adjusting the shed’s placement to minimize visibility and environmental impact. The board suggested an alternative location for the shed 50 feet back, between trees, to alleviate concerns about the front yard setback. However, the homeowner raised concerns regarding potential damage to the trees’ root structures and the impact on a children’s play area. After much debate, a resolution was achieved with a unanimous 7-0 vote in favor of the application with the proposed relocation.

Another application discussed was from the Roundtree family on Hampton Drive. The family and their architect presented a comprehensive renovation plan, expressing their attachment to the community and the need to update and expand their living spaces. The board recognized the merits of the project and acknowledged the architect’s expertise, moving forward with the application.

A homeowner’s proposal to repurpose their backyard by replacing a patio with a deck to create a larger entertaining space also came under scrutiny. Concerns were raised about the feasibility of creating a functional multi-level space in the restricted square footage and potential impact on the front yard setback. The conversation extended to aesthetic considerations and the importance of maintaining the property’s visual appeal in line with the neighborhood. A compromise was proposed, which involved removing part of the patio and constructing a smaller deck to reduce lot coverage.

In a related discussion, the homeowner’s need for a variance for a front yard setback, side yard setbacks, a generator variance, and building coverages due to their renovation plans was examined. The board and homeowner contemplated various options to reduce coverage, including redesigning the front walkway and repurposing materials from the patio. A detailed debate ensued over the size of the patio, with a consensus reached to reduce it to 375 square feet, achieving a net reduction of 110 square feet.

The board also reviewed a request to expand a driveway at another property to better accommodate the resident’s growing family. The practicality of the expansion was weighed against coverage and drainage implications. The board was receptive to the homeowner’s willingness to undertake the driveway expansion in conjunction with the proposed construction project.

An application for a property on Princeton Avenue was presented, which plans for a modernized ranch home expansion, including a new garage and master suite. The board discussed the challenges of the narrow lot and the necessity to comply with setback requirements, especially concerning the proposed garage. The architect provided clarifications regarding the dimensions and clearance of the garage space.

Further, the board assessed a proposed garage addition and remodeling project, including a roof renovation and expansions to the living space. Members raised issues about the narrowness of the lot and potential impact on neighboring properties. A revised application was submitted in response to discussions about the placement of a generator, driveway width, and permits for previous work.

Lastly, a debate arose over another building project’s height and window placement. Disagreement emerged over the generator’s location, with some members concerned about the front yard’s integrity and permit requirements. After a thorough discussion, the board approved the application with conditions, including the addition of a window to the garage, ensuring downward-directed lighting, and mandating permits for tree removal.