The meeting’s most pressing topic was the detailed examination of the proposed additions to a ranch house on Cellan Block. The board reviewed the application submitted by Philip and Relle Bren, which sought permission to add a great room, walk-in closet, and two-car garage. The board scrutinized the need for variances, prompted by the lot’s unique shape, front setback discrepancies, and the driveway’s proximity to the property line. There was considerable discussion about the interpretation of the zoning ordinance, the scope of renovations, and the exterior improvements to the house. The project also raised issues regarding stormwater management, lighting, and the removal of trees and ornamental plantings. The board’s interrogation extended to amendments to the driveway and the necessity for a street opening permit and inspection. Despite the intricacies, the board approved the application after a motion was made.

Another salient issue was the construction in the Cinnamon Ridge area, where the board delved into soil testing and the movement of fill from the property. The applicant provided an update on the process, including the delivery of topsoil and the disposal of removed soil. The number of dump trucks involved and the specific actions taken were points of contention. The board, taken aback by the lack of prior information regarding the soil removal, pressed for clarification on the sequence of events and demanded receipts for soil disposal. Further, the board requested documentation on the quantity of soil imported and exported to ensure proper record-keeping and procedural adherence.

The construction of a retaining wall was another focal point, with in-depth conversations about its dimensions, foundation depth, and the requirement for an engineer’s certification. The board debated the necessity of permits for the project, emphasizing the need for soil testing and stormwater management plans. Concerns were voiced about the project commencing without the necessary permits, and there were discrepancies in the approval process. The board’s focus on the height of the retaining wall and the engineer’s certification underscored the complexity and significance of this discussion.

Discussions also veered into the potential impact of a patio’s construction on soil disturbance and the surrounding environment. The board considered a vegetative restoration plan, the placement of greenery, and core testing for soil. There was disagreement on whether the elevation change of the surface had altered water flow toward neighboring properties. The meeting concluded with the decision to adjourn and reconvene on October 24th to continue the discussion.

Furthermore, the board engaged in a conversation about the development of Cinnamon Ridge and Holly Homes, as well as an easement in the area. The distinction between two separate projects – the wall construction and the patio work – was a topic of debate. The timing of the work prompted questions about whether these should be considered one project or two, especially concerning soil disturbance and permit requirements from Somerset County Soil.