09:08The board focused intensely on the request from the applicants associated with 7 Mountain Road, who sought an additional year to secure construction permits. The applicants explained that despite their efforts, communication with their site engineer, Mr. Parker, had been difficult, with numerous attempts to reach him going unanswered. They underscored that no changes to the originally approved plans were proposed; their need for more time stemmed solely from delays in obtaining the required site plans. The representative for the applicants mentioned that if these delays persisted, they might consider hiring a different engineer to ensure progress.

The board’s attorney provided context by outlining the history of the application. It had already received approval and a subsequent reapproval, which included a variance and minor subdivision approval. The original condition required permits to be obtained by June 7, 2024, which was later extended to June 7, 2025. The current request was for an extension until June 7, 2026. However, the board deliberated on the implications of granting a two-year extension, with concerns that it might allow the engineer to deprioritize the project. A one-year extension was ultimately deemed more appropriate to maintain momentum.

In a parallel discussion, the board turned its attention to a family’s urgent need to construct a new house on a recently acquired lot for their daughter, who would soon be entering middle school. The family expressed frustration over potential project delays, and the board highlighted the importance of setting a specific timeframe for construction permits to avoid “sleeping variances,” where projects are indefinitely postponed.

Concerns were raised about the current engineer, Steve Parker, who had a history with the lot involving issues with timely filing of deeds. This had previously necessitated new approvals for the applicants. There was a debate on whether the family should continue working with Parker or consider hiring a new engineer. The board suggested that a new professional might expedite the process, especially given the straightforward nature of the lot, which posed minimal engineering challenges.

The board advised the family to prioritize hiring an architect to design the house, noting that an architect could recommend a suitable engineer if needed. This strategy was aimed at ensuring the project moved forward efficiently. A board member, drawing on their background as a retired development manager, noted that the engineering work could be completed quickly due to the simplicity of the site.

Ultimately, the board agreed to a one-year condition for securing construction permits, emphasizing the importance of keeping the project on track. They noted that the only variance previously granted was for lot yield, which had already been acted upon, mitigating concerns about variance expiration.