The central focus of the meeting revolved around the appropriate number of parking spaces needed for the ISBR’s proposed mosque. Several experts provided varying assessments, utilizing different methodologies to calculate parking space requirements. Experts debated whether to base these requirements on the gross square footage of the facility or to focus on specific variables like the number of prayer mats. One expert argued for a multiplier approach, using a figure of 1.35 to 1.4 persons per vehicle to determine parking needs, while another highlighted the necessity of considering the unique attendance patterns of a mosque, which differs from traditional churches or synagogues.

Concerns were raised about the feasibility of accommodating parking demand during peak times, such as Friday prayers and religious holidays, when attendance might exceed average levels. The board deliberated on the potential for overflow parking and the implications of insufficient parking spaces on safety and traffic congestion.

The debate also touched upon the interpretation of local zoning ordinances. One perspective suggested that the ordinance’s definition of a “church” should encompass all houses of worship, including mosques, while another emphasized the need for distinct considerations given the mosque’s operational differences. The board explored whether the mosque should adhere to the same standards as churches or whether adjustments were necessary to reflect its specific use.

In addition to the mosque’s parking requirements, the board discussed the scheduling of future hearings for the ISBR application. After considering the availability of board members and the need for thorough deliberation, it was decided to continue the hearing on July 25th, with the extension for board action pushed to the end of August.

The board also addressed zoning recommendations, particularly those related to the definition of impervious coverage. There was a consensus among board members to suggest a review, rather than an amendment, of this definition to the township committee. This move aimed to clarify the zoning ordinance, which would assist both applicants and the zoning board in future applications.