The application for a property on Chimney Ash Farm Road proposed an increase in impervious coverage from the allowed 20% to 22.4%. This request sparked detailed deliberations among board members, who weighed the historical context of the property’s existing 22.4% coverage against current zoning regulations. One board member acknowledged the challenge of addressing prior approvals, stating, “I understand that we’re trying to come to you for forgiveness for something that we didn’t do,” highlighting the complexities of rectifying past non-compliance.

The discussion also focused on the design elements of the proposed addition, particularly a covered porch intended to allow for better drainage by permitting rain and snow to percolate through. A board member pointed out that the design did not alter the property, saying, “the design is not like we’re just dropping this giant box onto the property.” This sentiment helped frame the variance request as a modest adjustment rather than a major overhaul.

Public commentary supported the Cooks’ application, with neighbor Bill Gilligan emphasizing the positive community impact. He remarked, “I believe that the requested variance is reasonable and would not adversely impact the character or value of the neighborhood,” underscoring community backing for the project.

As the board moved towards a decision, they categorized the variances as C2, focusing on improving the housing stock and the overall quality of the neighborhood. One member noted, “anything that improves the housing stock and the overall quality of the neighborhood is a zoning purpose,” aligning the project with broader zoning goals. The board ultimately approved the application, with conditions to ensure the exterior additions matched the existing dwelling and compliance with specific construction department comments.

In another discussion, the board addressed a proposal for modifications to a property on Chimes Farm Road. The applicant aimed to expand the kitchen and add a bedroom in the walkout basement. The proposed redesign included a larger dining area and a home gym. The resident emphasized the importance of maintaining family proximity, particularly considering the home’s location near Oak Street School.

The kitchen expansion would extend to the existing deck footprint, adding a covered area for outdoor dining. The resident confirmed that no trees would need to be removed and that the renovations would not alter the front facade of the house. The board acknowledged that similar expansions had occurred in the neighborhood, with the resident’s property being one of the few without prior additions.

The meeting also reviewed an application for a property on Cedar Street, where homeowner Erica McFaden sought variances for a one-story mudroom and side entry addition. The architect detailed the plans, which included enclosing a porch and adding a mudroom for easier access to the home. McFaden expressed willingness to plant additional shrubbery to mitigate water runoff and enhance privacy.

Further deliberations included a proposal for a property on Chimes Farm Road owned by the Cook family, which focused on adding a one-story addition to improve kitchen functionality and outdoor accessibility. The architect explained the design aimed to create a more open layout and better connect the house to the outdoor space, including a swimming pool and patio. The board discussed zoning compliance, particularly regarding side yard setbacks, and the applicant confirmed that new structures would respect zoning regulations.

Emphasis was placed on ensuring compliance with zoning regulations while accommodating the applicants’ needs for expanded living spaces.