The meeting opened with a presentation from the school district’s superintendent, Brian Bol, who outlined the comprehensive plan behind the upcoming school referendum. The proposal seeks to improve safety measures and educational facilities across the district’s three schools. Bol emphasized the strategic opportunity this referendum presents, owing to an expiring debt that allows for a net-neutral transaction. This financial maneuver ensures that the new debt replaces the old without raising the tax burden on residents.

A critical component of the referendum is the expectation of receiving approximately 34% of the funding from state aid, which Bol asserted is vital since annual budget-funded projects do not qualify for such aid. The state aid, combined with the proposed $38 million in funding, translates to a net cost of roughly $25.4 million for the district over a 20-year term.

Significant enhancements outlined in the proposal include the modernization of science labs, the development of technology and engineering labs, and the establishment of a culinary arts program aimed at expanding career and technical education opportunities. Security improvements are also a priority, with plans to install additional camera systems, enhance notification and lockdown systems, and construct a new security vestibule at Bedwell School.

In response to queries about the referendum process, it was clarified that it would be a straightforward vote among the three boroughs, without requiring separate votes for each. The meeting also addressed the potential consequences if the referendum fails, such as exploring revised projects or seeking another community vote. The importance of preparing students for future careers was underscored, with Bol stating, “Our role here as a school district… is to prepare students for careers that do not even exist yet.”

Shifting focus from educational initiatives, the meeting also tackled the long-standing issue of a dam removal project. After a hiatus of about three and a half years, an update was provided on the benefits of removing the dam, which includes eliminating ownership liability risks, restoring fish habitats in Minebrook, and improving overall water quality. The project requires four key permits, with one already obtained after two years of effort. However, the wetlands permit remains pending, with hopes for resolution by December. The speaker highlighted the administrative delays in obtaining permits, attributing them to staffing shortages in state agencies.

The estimated costs for safely upgrading the dam were discussed as well. Upgrades would involve installing an increased spillway and overtopping protection, with costs projected to rise from $2.7 million to about $3.4 million by 2026 due to inflation and construction cost increases. Engineering consulting fees and ongoing maintenance costs add further financial considerations.

Public comments during the meeting acknowledged the borough staff’s work in managing rising benefit costs and addressed the challenges related to parking at local schools. The lack of parking options forced staff and visitors to park on the street, prompting discussions with school officials about potential solutions.

Additionally, the council addressed accessibility issues regarding green acres facilities, such as pickleball courts and bowling grounds. Concerns were raised about limited local access due to their open designation for all residents from surrounding towns. The council also passed several ordinances, including one that requires the payment of delinquent taxes before issuing municipal licenses or permits.

Continuing with public infrastructure themes, a proposal for new stop signs at the Five Corners intersection was discussed. The council considered the necessity of an ordinance for police enforcement and noted that the county would be responsible for implementing the changes.