10:21The board’s primary focus was on addressing the application related to floodgates, which came after a previous denial of a zoning permit. The floodgates, recommended by the property owner’s insurance company due to a history of flooding at the site, are designed as manually operated structures that automatically rise when water reaches a certain depth. An architect described the setup, explaining that the floodgates would serve two areas: a larger stairwell and a smaller kitchen stair, both of which would be protected from water ingress during significant flood events. The floodgates’ mechanics were detailed, emphasizing their ability to block water, thereby safeguarding the property.

34:25However, the discussion revealed concerns about the integration of the drainage system with the floodgates. A point of contention emerged regarding the drainage mechanism’s capability during extreme weather, particularly the operation of a backflow preventer. Participants questioned whether the storm sewer system would overflow, rendering the drainage ineffective. The architectural plans were scrutinized, with some asserting that they inadequately depicted the drainage system’s functionality.

Debate ensued over whether the drain was situated on the wet or dry side of the gate, impacting its ability to manage residual water effectively. The necessity for the drain to handle normal rainwater runoff, in addition to post-flood conditions, was emphasized. Participants recalled past instances where similar connections to the stormwater infrastructure were made, albeit with uncertainties about the permitting process.

41:56Board members stressed the importance of ensuring public safety and compliance with local regulations.

03:37In addition to the floodgate waiver, the board revisited the substantial Recreation Plan, which requires review due to its implications for local recreational facilities. The plan’s importance was highlighted by statutory deadlines for adopting a housing element and fair share plan by June 30. The chairman underscored the urgency of these matters, emphasizing the need to adhere to statutory requirements to avoid potential implications for the borough.

The proposed Recreation Plan involves logistical considerations, including potential remote presentations by the out-of-state author. The board acknowledged the procedural aspects of the plan’s adoption, noting that while multiple hearings might be held, only one public hearing was necessary. Facilitating board members’ access to the document was deemed critical to ensure familiarity with its contents.

Moreover, the board considered the design and placement of new stairs in relation to the floodgate installation. The design was affirmed to maintain a clear pathway along the sidewalk, aligning with existing accessibility requirements.

51:52The meeting concluded with the board’s approval of the site plan waiver, contingent upon compliance with conditions outlined in a prior review letter. The waiver approval included stipulations for obtaining necessary permits from relevant agencies, emphasizing the collaborative efforts required to address regulatory requirements and community needs.