The board’s deliberations on future meeting formats underscored a shift in administrative procedure. Members expressed varied opinions on whether to continue meetings virtually or revert to in-person sessions. The technology challenges associated with hybrid models were noted, leading to a clear consensus against their adoption. One member emphasized the benefits of in-person meetings for engagement and interaction. However, others highlighted the inclusivity of virtual meetings, allowing participation from those facing logistical barriers such as childcare. Ultimately, a motion was passed to conduct in-person meetings with the option for virtual attendance if deemed necessary by the chairperson.

Attention then turned to a proposed subdivision involving two existing two-family homes, where a new single-family home is to be added. The board reviewed detailed exhibits outlining the implications of the subdivision on existing lot configurations and neighborhood dynamics. The proposal was discussed in the context of the municipality’s master plan, which aims to enhance local character and support downtown businesses. The applicant’s representative argued that the project would contribute positively to the local economy by increasing foot traffic, aligning with planning goals.

A comprehensive review of the site’s current conditions revealed that the properties have been multi-family residences since before 1971. This historical context provided a basis for the board’s consideration of variances related to side yard setbacks and impervious coverage. Existing conditions were cited to justify these variances, with the representative noting that the current impervious coverage was well below the maximum allowed. The board deliberated on the potential environmental impacts.

Concerns about parking arrangements were also addressed, particularly regarding a gravel area that had been used for tenant parking. The board agreed that this area should be removed to comply with impervious coverage requirements. Additionally, conditions were proposed to prevent parking in the backyard, maintaining the space’s integrity for family use. The board emphasized the need for enforcement of these conditions, tasking the building officer with addressing any violations.

The meeting concluded with a vote to grant a D-68 variance for the pre-existing nonconforming structures, allowing the new home to be built.

Other items on the agenda included the swearing-in of new board members and the appointment of various officials and consultants for the year 2024. The board quickly approved resolutions for legal, engineering, and planning services, emphasizing the importance of these roles in supporting the board’s functions. Additionally, the meeting calendar for the year was confirmed, with adjustments made for holidays.

The board also addressed administrative matters, such as the review and amendment of previous meeting minutes, and discussed the requirements for public hearing notices after confusion arose regarding the Liberty Farm dog application. These procedural discussions underscore the board’s focus on transparency and accountability in its operations.