The meeting’s most significant topic was the public hearing on the settlement proposal for the Palmer Square site redevelopment. The board’s attorney provided an in-depth explanation of the legal framework guiding the settlement process, referencing case law that encourages settlements in land-use disputes. The previous deadlock in board votes prompted the applicant, AR and Bernardsville LLC, to pursue settlement negotiations, resulting in a proposal that was presented during the meeting. The settlement terms were publicly disclosed, as required by the Whispering Woods case law.

The applicant, represented by Mr. John Witchescala, outlined the project’s background and its alignment with the borough council’s redevelopment vision. The Palmer Square site, identified as an area needing redevelopment, presents a plan to transform into a vibrant mixed-use community. The redevelopment ordinance, introduced earlier in the year, had undergone public scrutiny and board review before council adoption. The site plan application, filed in September, proposed more commercial space than required and included various design adjustments influenced by public feedback.

Representatives from the Masonic Lodge, adjacent to the construction site, voiced apprehension regarding potential disruptions and structural damage to their historic building. They emphasized the need for the project to be sensitive to the preservation of historical architecture, recounting past incidents of damage caused by nearby quarry operations. The construction representatives assured the lodge of their commitment to minimizing impact and pledged to engage in pre-construction discussions to address these concerns.

Traffic and safety issues were also prominent in public discussions. Residents questioned the impact of the development on local traffic patterns, particularly regarding access on Route 202. Concerns were raised about the adequacy of traffic studies and the involvement of the New Jersey Department of Transportation (DOT). The board reiterated that extensive studies had been conducted, and the applicant agreed to adhere to DOT conditions, which might include adjusting speed limits or modifying plans to secure necessary permits.

The settlement proposal incorporated numerous conditions, exceeding one hundred, which is unusually high for similar projects. These conditions reflect an effort to address public and board concerns comprehensively. The applicant agreed to construction management measures to mitigate disruptions, including traffic control plans and collaboration with local authorities.

The public hearing also served as a platform for residents to voice broader concerns about the project’s impact on Bernardsville’s character and historical preservation efforts. Some residents expressed dissatisfaction with the perceived finality of decisions and the board’s handling of the redevelopment process. Calls for preserving historical structures, such as the “boiling house,” were made, urging the board to explore preservation options.

The applicant’s responsibility to comply with affordable housing provisions and the potential impact on local schools were discussed. The board considered these factors while ensuring that the redevelopment plan adhered to municipal land-use laws.

Ultimately, the board voted to approve the settlement proposal, with several members voting in favor and one abstaining due to concerns about the applicant’s transparency with DOT dealings. The decision marks a step in resolving the ongoing litigation and advancing the redevelopment project. The board plans to finalize the resolution within the designated timeframe.