The board delved into a traffic impact study prepared by John Porak, focusing on the challenges posed by the existing vehicular access points on Mount AR Road and Route 202. The study highlighted difficulties related to sight lines, turning movements, and pedestrian accessibility. The development aimed to tackle these issues by reconfiguring vehicular access and relocating the loading zone to Mount AR Road. However, concerns were raised about the suitability of the proposed loading zone location, its compliance with county requirements, and the accessibility for larger vehicles, particularly in relation to three-bedroom apartment units. The board emphasized the need for clarity on the types of vehicles using the loading area and the practicality of the proposed solution.

Further discussions arose around the management and control of residential move-ins and move-outs, questioning the study’s assumptions about the number and types of deliveries, the utilization of the loading zone by rideshare services, and the potential impact on the surrounding area. The board also inquired about the methodology behind conducting traffic counts during peak periods, the future traffic conditions considering the site’s proximity to the train station, and walkability. Specifics on peak hour trips and the adjustments made for internal capture and pass-by trips were scrutinized, with the board probing the impact of transit use and questioning the validity of the level of service C at the intersection in question.

The board engaged in a debate on the use of land use codes for trip generation calculations, the application of credits for mass transit proximity, and the suggestion to update the traffic analysis software. The traffic engineer acknowledged the need to consider the latest software for future analyses.

A resident’s concerns about potential truck routes affecting local neighborhoods prompted the board to coordinate with a traffic engineer to understand expected truck routes. The board also tackled the design and layout of a parking garage, with a focus on the accessibility and functionality of elevators and ramps, the allocation of parking spaces for retail customers, and the design of ramps with appropriate sight lines.

The discussion extended to the architectural aspects of the development, specifically the placement of garbage chutes and compactors within the parking garage, which sparked debate about the practicality and impact on the project’s value. The board also addressed the design and layout of the building, examining the functionality and accessibility of the retail spaces and the compliance with accessibility requirements.

In terms of the residential aspect of the development, the layout of the apartments and access to amenities such as a courtyard and roof terrace were examined. The board scrutinized the differences between the floors of the building, the unique design elements of the fourth floor, and the aesthetic impact of the roof design.

The meeting concluded with the board deciding to continue the discussion at the next meeting and addressing a pending application. There was also a resolution regarding the logistics of attendance for the next meeting, including provisions for virtual participation and scheduling.