The most notable discussion centered on the proposed Welcoming City ordinance, which seeks to codify existing practices of the Bethlehem Police Department in handling immigration enforcement. This proposal has prompted extensive public feedback, with residents voicing concerns over the protection of immigrant communities within Bethlehem. Advocates for the ordinance argue that it would ensure a permanent policy of non-cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, such as ICE, unless mandated by state or federal law. They insist that such a measure would safeguard immigrants from potential abuses and foster an inclusive community environment.

Public sentiment was in favor of the ordinance, with several speakers sharing personal stories and fears related to immigration enforcement. One speaker notablely stated, “Our city was built by immigrants and we would not be the same without everyone that makes up our community.” This perspective was echoed by others who argued that Bethlehem’s identity is deeply intertwined with its immigrant population, urging the council to “prove to the people of Bethlehem that they are valued.”

Critics of the ordinance caution that it may give a false sense of security and could potentially conflict with federal regulations. During the meeting, some residents expressed skepticism, arguing that the city should focus on federal immigration reform rather than local ordinances. They pointed out that Bethlehem’s current practices already align with the proposed ordinance’s goals.

The meeting also addressed the contentious issue of zoning changes for a proposed mixed-use development at 11-15 West Garrison Street. This project aims to convert the current high-density residential zone into a central business district, facilitating the construction of a 70-unit apartment building with ground-level retail space. Proponents of the development, including representatives from BPG Investments LLC, argued that the project would revitalize the area and address housing shortages in Bethlehem. They emphasized the development’s potential to generate significant tax revenue and improve public safety by filling vacant lots.

However, the proposal has faced staunch opposition from some community members concerned about “spot zoning” and its implications for neighborhood character. One resident warned, “If you approve this, it’s going to end up in the courts and they’re going to lose,” citing past zoning controversies in the area. Critics fear the development could exacerbate existing parking issues and alter the historical aesthetic of Bethlehem.

The council discussed various aspects of the zoning amendment, including the project’s compliance with existing regulations and its impact on local infrastructure. Questions were raised about the proposed building’s height and parking capacity, with some council members expressing concerns over potential overflow issues. The project’s architectural design, which includes an L-shaped building with a stepped-back facade, aims to blend with the surrounding neighborhood, but opinions remain divided on its effectiveness.

Public comments revealed a broader anxiety over the rapid pace of development in Bethlehem and its impact on housing affordability. Residents voiced frustration over high rental prices and the perceived prioritization of profit over community needs. One speaker drew parallels to Vienna’s socialized housing solutions, advocating for a more community-focused approach to urban planning.

In addition to these primary issues, the council meeting addressed various administrative matters, including a memorandum from the mayor and Emergency Management Coordinator recommending the adoption of the Lehigh Valley 2024 Hazard Mitigation Plan update.