The variance granted to Lorber, allowing a setback reduction for his pool construction, highlighted the commission’s willingness to accommodate residents’ property improvement efforts. Lorber’s property, an older home with a recent addition, posed challenges due to the location of the septic tank, necessitating the variance. The commission’s unanimous approval followed a review of the evidence presented, which included answers to four variance questions and demonstrated that all requirements had been met.

The meeting also focused attention on the environmental resilience of Biscayne Park. The Office of Resilience, along with the County Mayor and her team, presented on issues such as water and sewer challenges, including the septic to sewer conversion, as part of the “connect to protect” program. The adaptation action area, a component of the county’s resilience efforts, was highlighted with the Little River adaptation action area as a focal point. The area is part of the Biscayne Bay water quality improvement grant program, which has supported 39 properties in their connection to the county’s wastewater system. The commission discussed the need for federal and state funding to assist with the efforts and plans to invest $90 million to install laterals for up to 9,000 properties over the next five years.

Moreover, the commission addressed the community’s concerns regarding traffic and transportation. They discussed the upcoming Bright Line or Tri-Rail train and the need for local mobility options, along with the Vision Zero program which aims to improve bicycle and pedestrian safety. An interlocal agreement was mentioned that would provide the community with jurisdiction over decisions about traffic calming measures. Specific dangerous intersections were identified for potential safety improvements.

Residents’ comments during the meeting covered a variety of issues, including concerns about the expansion of Miami Country Day School and its impact on local traffic, the removal of a fairy house from a tree in the median, and amendments to the ordinance related to trash and garbage on medians. The commission replied with discussions about their official position on the school expansion, with plans to gather more information and engage with project representatives to understand the potential effects on the community.

The commission’s discussions also encompassed the upcoming special election for a village commissioner, the certification of election results, and the swearing-in of a new commissioner. They debated the timing and process for these events, ultimately deciding to set a special agenda meeting for the certification.

In addition, the commission discussed the village’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), which outlined various projects and budget constraints. The plan’s flexibility was emphasized, with the understanding that it could be revisited and changed as needed. Concerns were raised about ensuring the police department’s budget was not exceeded and the need for a feasibility study and a debt policy before incurring debt. The commission also touched upon codifying the village seal and the unauthorized use by a real estate firm.

The meeting concluded with a demonstration of a proposed new format for project tracking, which would involve a spreadsheet for logging weekly updates on ongoing projects. This method aims to provide a comprehensive and easily accessible record of progress and ensure continuity in reporting.