0:00The meeting’s most noteworthy discussion centered on a concrete driveway proposal at 11921 Northeast 12 Avenue. The applicant outlined plans for the driveway to extend 20 feet into the property line. However, the board identified an issue with the lot coverage, which must not exceed 40%. The applicant had not submitted the necessary form to confirm compliance with this regulation. The board provided a blank form and approved the proposal conditionally, pending submission of the completed documentation.

Another discussion involved a proposal for a metal fence on Northeast 117 Street. The applicant described the fence as a four-foot-high structure set back three feet from the property line and fifteen feet from the front. Concerns were raised about a section of chain link fence intended for the property’s rear, with the board insisting on a uniform design for the entire rear line. Safety concerns regarding the spacing of vertical pickets were highlighted, particularly with a pool planned for the backyard. The proposal was approved on the condition that a revised drawing reflecting the discussed requirements be submitted.

The board also reviewed a gravel driveway proposal for 1000 Northeast 120th Street. The applicant clarified the plan to include both a circular concrete driveway and a gravel driveway. The board requested updated plans showing the new driveway location, noting that missing documentation led to the motion being tabled. Specifications for the gravel type and size were requested upon resubmission.

A proposal for a metal fence at 11150 Griffing Boulevard was another focal point. The board noted the presence of a construction fence but lacked details on the proposed fence’s location. The applicant was asked to provide additional documentation to clarify the situation. Compliance with current codes was emphasized, implying potential removal of existing structures to meet standards.

The discussion also touched on a proposed concrete driveway at 11623 Northeast 11th Place. Board members stressed the importance of adhering to the 40% coverage limit for solid materials in the right-of-way. The necessity to remove excess asphalt to comply with these regulations was underscored, with the board reiterating that all driveway modifications must align with existing codes.

26:44During the meeting, the board emphasized the 40% coverage rule for driveway materials, including gravel, concrete, or pavers. One case under review exceeded this limit, prompting suggestions for the applicant to reconsider their materials and layout. If gravel was chosen, additional stipulations such as border requirements were noted.

In another matter, the board discussed a fence application at 11150 Griffing Boulevard involving a 3-inch gap in the fencing design, raising safety concerns about climbability. The board suggested revisions to eliminate the gap, pointing to the importance of compliance with safety codes.

A preliminary review of a new construction project on Northeast 118 Street revealed the plans were still in a developmental stage. The board debated whether to proceed with the review or table it for further development, noting past similar projects that underwent changes. Compliance with a 10-foot setback on all sides was emphasized.

Another new construction project at 11315 Northeast 9th Court faced issues related to setbacks. The current plans did not meet the required 15-foot setback for the second story, providing only a 13-foot setback.

Concerns about the alignment and articulation of elevations were raised during the review of the second-story design. Discrepancies between the elevation drawings and the presented plans, particularly regarding the garage and balcony configurations, were noted. Clarity on these elements and adherence to regulations based on base flood elevation was emphasized.

The meeting also focused on architectural features, such as window placements and their impact on privacy and views. Questions about the configuration of windows in relation to neighboring properties, especially a window in the primary bathroom, were discussed. The board stressed careful consideration of these elements in future revisions.

51:06Discussions about a driveway plan for 1091 Northeast 10th Avenue highlighted the need for necessary documentation to secure a building permit, emphasizing zoning requirements and parking space regulations. The applicant was advised to reconsider the number of parking spots and retain certain elements of the existing structure.

The board also reviewed a new construction application for 1201 Northeast 11th Place, discussing the completeness of the application and the need for an application number for formal review. Compliance with coverage and setback requirements was noted, with accurate measurements emphasized to avoid future regulatory issues.