The most significant topic of the evening was the selection of an interim village manager, with the Commission focused on candidates Albert Childis and Mr. Sid, both of whom received endorsements from various commissioners. Albert Childis, noted for his extensive experience in city management, was a strong contender, with one resident highlighting his familiarity with the village’s issues. However, the debate intensified around whether the interim manager should be allowed to apply for the permanent role, as concerns about transparency and potential conflicts arose. Childis expressed willingness to commit to a three to five-year term, emphasizing the importance of continuity in executing the village’s strategic plan.

The financial aspect of hiring an interim manager also took center stage, with the Commission discussing the advertised salary of $100,000 without benefits. Commissioners were keenly aware of budget constraints, considering how the interim role’s compensation would fit within the village’s financial framework. Discussions revealed that the total budget for the village manager, including salary and benefits, was set at $176,000. The Commission weighed the possibility of using savings accrued from the position’s vacancy to offer a more competitive package, but concerns about overspending persisted.

Further complicating the decision-making process was the debate on the appropriate timeframe for the interim role. Some commissioners advocated for a longer commitment to allow the interim manager to address the village’s challenges thoroughly, while others cautioned against setting a fixed term that could limit flexibility in finding a permanent manager. The conversation underscored the need for a balanced approach between structured timelines and adaptable processes.

A notable candidate, Mr. Sid, also presented his qualifications, boasting extensive experience as the former mayor of Miami Lakes. He highlighted his administrative acumen and strategic planning capabilities, though he, too, was subject to budgetary considerations. Mr. Sid expressed willingness to accept the interim role at the advertised salary, providing a competitive option against Childis. Despite the support for Mr. Sid, the commission expressed the need for careful evaluation and consideration of all potential candidates.

As the meeting progressed, the focus shifted towards the procedural steps necessary to finalize the interim manager’s contract and continue the search for a permanent manager. The Commission discussed the use of a headhunter to assist in the hiring process, a move intended to ensure an unbiased and comprehensive search for qualified candidates. The potential use of a headhunter raised questions about timing and cost, with the aim of having options and guidance by December.