The search for an interim superintendent was the primary agenda item, with committee members presenting detailed evaluations of candidates based on background checks and reference evaluations. Morin emerged as the leading candidate, praised for her fiscal strengths and advocacy for students. References highlighted her passion, stating, “Morin doesn’t need to work; she is doing this because she loves it.” Her previous interim experience and fiscal expertise were key factors that resonated with several committee members.

The committee’s evaluation process included discussions on other candidates as well. Eric Chofy received commendation for his understanding of instructional leadership and empathy, while Ginger Coleman was noted for her dedication and data-driven approach, particularly in Title IX and special education. Caleb Rivera’s feedback was mixed, although one reference described him as a brilliant advocate for student identities.

Further evaluations were presented by a committee member on Ellen Whitmore, whose crisis management skills were highlighted, and Susan Kuska, praised for decision-making ability but noted for a reserved personality. Erin Vanaco reported on Tracy Curley and David Cutler, but only received personal feedback on Cutler.

The committee’s discussion revealed a strong preference for Morin, with members expressing their support and noting her suitability for the role. However, concerns were raised about negotiating without direct communication with Morin. Dan Keefe clarified that under Massachusetts law, the committee could proceed with negotiations as long as they met legal requirements. A motion to enter negotiations with Morin was made and passed, with one abstention from a member due to their position.

As the meeting progressed, the committee focused on the logistics of appointing Morin. They discussed establishing contract negotiation parameters, involving legal counsel, and ensuring a welcoming gesture towards Morin. Tracy was authorized to contact Morin to notify her of the decision and start initial discussions about her contract.

The committee planned a subsequent executive session to finalize contract details, acknowledging the urgency of having a superintendent by the July 1st deadline. The importance of timely engagement with Morin was emphasized, with suggestions for preliminary discussions between her and the legal counsel to expedite the process. Members agreed that a personal welcome was important, alongside formal negotiations.