The town’s water system, established around 1911, faces substantial repair needs, including outdated equipment, high treatment costs, and inadequate mapping of underground infrastructure. A council member highlighted the urgency imposed by state mandates, which require prompt action to address these issues. Privatization was presented as a viable solution, with the argument that a private entity could manage the system more due to greater financial resources and specialized teams.

Attractive factors for potential buyers included a newly established well supplying good-quality water and the proximity of a prestigious private high school. Queries about the implications of a private company potentially transporting water to other areas, which could affect the local aquifer, were addressed with assurances that such activities would likely be limited to commercial purposes rather than widespread extraction.

The financial perspective of municipal versus private management sparked debate. While the town would seek quick recoupment of its investments, a private company could view the venture as profitable over decades. The council member noted, “from a business perspective, it makes a lot of sense for them to do this,” highlighting the differing motivations.

Concerns about the impact on local development were also discussed. The absence of sewer systems in some areas and available land for development could complicate future growth. The council reiterated that while public water can enhance development potential, sewage infrastructure must also be considered.

In another significant public comment, a resident named Mike provided an update on a court hearing related to a property on Vernon Street, where a settlement hearing is scheduled for November 13. He reported that the cleanup, expected to involve close to 1,000 truckloads of material, will be overseen by the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Mike expressed skepticism about the timeline and outcomes, stating, “I’ll believe it when I see it,” and raised concerns about cleanup costs potentially surpassing the property’s value.

Also during public comments, another resident voiced strong opposition to the potential sale of the town’s water supply, fearing increased rates and urging the council to consult the public before making such a decision. The resident referenced a former law requiring a public referendum for any sale of water, emphasizing the need for community input.

Discussions then shifted to the town’s open space tax. The same resident questioned the doubling of the tax and the allocation of the accumulated funds. A council member clarified that the open space tax had increased due to a small base amount, with the town raising approximately $280,000 quarterly for maintenance of open space properties, historical preservation, and recreation. However, it was emphasized that these funds have been depleted due to various maintenance efforts.

Frustration regarding the format for public comments was expressed by a resident named Joanne, who criticized the inconsistency in allowing questions. The council acknowledged her concerns and noted plans to change the format to allow more public interaction beginning January 1, 2025.

Financial support for the local fire company was another issue. A council member highlighted the need for compensation from neighboring municipalities to cover various costs, including water, insurance, and equipment maintenance. The council member insisted on receiving a minimum of $5,000 from the neighboring municipality to alleviate some of the financial burden, noting that the absence of funding has caused dissatisfaction among residents due to increased taxes.

Updates on infrastructure projects were provided by a resident, Tara, who mentioned the anticipated reopening of State Route 611 and multiple federally funded projects slated for 2025. Tara emphasized the need for a thorough environmental impact study for planned projects in the Delaware Water Gap region, calling for an independent review process that does not rely solely on federal agencies.

The meeting also covered the recent demolition of the Poina Dam, funded through fines and private donations. The removal of the dam transformed the area, with expectations of ecological recovery and aesthetic improvements over time. The council defended the decision, highlighting the long-term benefits despite some public dissatisfaction.

In other business, the council discussed ongoing issues with the water utility system, including the need for a backup well and potential sale processes. The necessity of extensive upgrades to the backup well, estimated at around $3 million, was emphasized. The viability of the town’s water service, which only reaches about 220 customers, was under scrutiny, with Blairstown representing approximately 40% of the overall water usage.

The meeting concluded with various reports, including those from the fire department, police department, and ambulance squad. The fire department responded to 38 calls in August, and the police department reported on a burglary incident and ongoing scam warnings. The ambulance squad detailed their recent activities, including 89 calls and training efforts for new EMTs.