Blandford Select Board Considers New Meeting Format and Opts Out of Mail-In Voting for Local Election

At the recent Blandford Select Board meeting, attention was given to the introduction of a new meeting structure aimed at improving interdepartmental communication and the decision to forgo mail-in voting for the upcoming local election due to budgetary constraints. Additionally, the board discussed updates on public participation guidelines and addressed several budget-related matters.

10:51A key topic of discussion was a proposal to replace one monthly Select Board meeting with a departmental round table. This initiative aims to enhance communication between the board and various town departments, facilitating a more informed understanding of ongoing projects, financial matters, and the challenges faced by different sectors. Representatives from the police, fire, library, and other departments would participate, promoting collaboration and transparency. Logistical considerations, such as scheduling and agenda-setting, were debated, with the board agreeing that this format could lead to better governance. The proposal received general support, with plans to finalize details in upcoming meetings.

32:22In an effort to manage budget constraints, the Select Board also decided to opt out of mail-in voting for the local election scheduled for June 14th. The town clerk highlighted the financial implications, noting the cost of mailing out applications to registered voters would be approximately $785 for stamps alone. Given the low voter turnout in previous elections, particularly in non-competitive races, the board concluded that the expense was not justified. The decision to forgo mail-in ballots was unanimous, although the board did not formally vote on maintaining the voting hours, which remained from 10 AM to 4 PM.

04:21Public participation guidelines were another focal point, with updates introduced to ensure compliance with open meeting laws. The new policy restricts public comments to Blandford residents, limits them to two minutes, and requires that comments pertain to agenda items. A resident expressed concern that the policy disenfranchises community members by limiting their ability to raise unforeseen issues. They suggested renaming the “public comment” section to “other business,” which could allow for a broader range of topics. While the board acknowledged the suggestion, they clarified that the section would not be moved but agreed to rearrange the agenda if necessary. They also committed to including relevant legal language in future agendas for clarity.

15:16The meeting also covered updates on the swap shop, which is expected to open by the end of the month, pending the arrival of necessary signage. An initial opening event is scheduled for May 3rd, and preparations are underway, including the establishment of operational rules and regulations. These will be made publicly available through the town website and at the transfer station.

In other discussions, the board explored grant opportunities to fund a new paint shop for proper paint disposal. Residents would need to pay for paint disposal, differentiating it from regular trash and recycling processes. There was also a brief mention of a grant related to oil, described as a small initiative.

42:23Budgetary concerns were a recurring theme, with discussions about departments exceeding their budgets and the need for fiscal management. The board touched on the police department’s vocational expenditures, which exceeded 124%, and the need for clarity on budget calculations. They also addressed the financial shortfall in the tree-related expenses.

23:41A debate arose regarding the goals of the highway superintendent, with some members emphasizing the need for clear, measurable goals with specific outcomes and deadlines. Others argued for allowing the superintendent to adapt to their role before imposing expectations.

41:29Additionally, the board addressed infrastructure concerns, particularly the condition of a collapsed culvert on Maple Lane, a private road. A letter was proposed to inform residents of the necessary repairs and request prompt action. The board emphasized the importance of legal wording in the communication to ensure residents understood their responsibilities.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: