A key point of contention revolved around the financial terms of the sale. It was clarified that the purchase price would be adjusted based on the extent of industrial development. If only 160,000 square feet of the industrial property were constructed, the borough’s proceeds would decrease from $2 million to $1 million. The hotel aspect of the project also drew scrutiny, with a stipulation that a minimum of 100 rooms is required for the hotel to secure a liquor license. The ordinance further distinguished between general and extended-stay hotels, prompting questions about an additional $330,000 payment to the borough should the developer opt for the latter type.

Additionally, the council debated the allocation of the land previously used by the Department of Public Works (DPW). Some members argued that the land was no longer needed for public purposes, despite ongoing issues with truck parking in the town. This sparked a broader discussion on whether the land should be retained for potential community facilities, such as recreational areas or municipal complexes, rather than focused solely on residential development.

The meeting also addressed community recreation concerns, particularly the lack of perceived benefits to residents from the sale. One resident articulated frustration, stating that “a lot of residents are upset that nothing’s being given back to us.” In response, council members highlighted recent investments, including $1.2 million for playgrounds and improvements to local fields, asserting that these facilities are among the best in the area. The council emphasized the continuous use of these fields.

A vision for future recreational development was shared, with hopes that a county park would integrate feedback from neighboring municipalities. The proposal for a community recreation center gained traction, with council members advocating for a facility that serves both seniors and youth, ideally located near school fields to enhance accessibility.

Another prominent topic was the introduction of a pilot program for new housing developments, which would yield at least $1.4 million in payments. While some council members supported the program, others expressed skepticism, questioning whether this figure adequately compensates for potential tax revenues. It was noted that prior estimates had projected $1.8 million based on 2015 tax rates.

The council acknowledged the need for ongoing negotiations with the local school regarding financial contributions from the pilot program. A signed contract was deemed essential before any commitments could be made, with one member noting, “we have no plan” until further discussions are concluded. The interconnected nature of municipal and educational funding was stressed, emphasizing the importance of collaboration to address budgetary concerns.

The meeting also featured the final reading of an ordinance authorizing the sale of specific municipal property. During the public hearing, a resident inquired about potential changes to hotel ordinances preceding the vote. Amendments were proposed to accommodate both “extended stay” and traditional hotel accommodations, prompting a motion to accept these modifications.