The renewal of the Comcast cable franchise agreement was a focal point of the meeting. This ten-year renewal, mirroring the previous 2015 contract, maintains the 5% franchise fee on cable services, although it fails to capture revenue from broadband or telephone services, which remain outside the regulatory purview. The decline in traditional cable service revenue has raised concerns, as many residents now prefer streaming platforms like Netflix and Hulu. With state-level legislation potentially allowing cities to grant broadband franchises, the council is exploring ways to broaden the definition of gross revenues under federal law to include more sources of income.

Customer service standards and local programming support were emphasized as critical components of the agreement. The council negotiated stronger provisions for public educational governmental (PEG) programming to ensure the continued viability of local broadcasts. Enforcement mechanisms, such as a performance bond and the ability to impose damages for non-compliance, were also discussed, though rarely used in the past. The franchise agreement remains subordinate to the city’s existing code, allowing for future regulatory modifications.

During the public hearing, a resident voiced frustration with Comcast’s service. The council clarified that while alternative services like T-Mobile Fiber may be available, they are distinct from cable television services governed by the franchise. Ultimately, the council approved the ordinance amending the city code to reflect the new terms of the franchise agreement, with an appendix created to incorporate the changes without traditional codification.

In addition to the franchise renewal, the council explored public transit improvements, with a presentation from Metro Transit representatives outlining initiatives to enhance service frequency and reliability. The “Network Now” project aims to adapt to changing travel patterns post-COVID-19, with plans to reinstate routes and introduce microtransit zones to better connect underserved areas. Safety and security on transit were addressed through the Metro Transit Security Action Plan, which includes increased personnel and community partnerships to improve conditions.

The council also delved into amendments to the zoning code, particularly regarding co-living developments. Proposed changes would introduce a new definition of co-living and establish standards for parking and other operational aspects. The council debated whether to treat co-living developments as multifamily residential uses in high-density and commercial zones.

Parking requirements for co-living units were a point of contention, with a recommendation for 0.5 spaces per unit. The council considered the implications of these standards on new constructions and the reuse of existing buildings, such as older office structures. A study on office conversions was suggested, acknowledging the suitability of these buildings for co-living arrangements.

The meeting further included updates on small business programming. Representatives from the Port Authority detailed efforts to support local businesses, highlighting initiatives like “Welcoming Wednesdays” for business advising and the “START” program for entrepreneurs. Financial assistance programs, including grants for sewer access charges and facade improvements, were also discussed, with significant investments reported in the community.

Council members reflected on progress since the pandemic underscored the necessity of supporting local businesses. They discussed the challenges of tracking success metrics and proposed employing MBA interns to assist with data analysis. The council emphasized the importance of equitable resource distribution and fostering relationships within the business community.

The session concluded with discussions on the council’s involvement in boards and commissions. The council plans to engage further with commissions to understand their perspectives and improve interactions. Concerns about the clarity of roles and responsibilities were raised, prompting suggestions for formal documentation in the city charter to prevent future ambiguity.