13:05The discussion began with council members expressing differing opinions on whether to proceed with a formal search process or appoint one of the current assistant city managers. Some members argued that a formal search would ensure a defensible and transparent hiring process, citing past experiences where adherence to a thorough process resulted in more robust outcomes. They emphasized the importance of evaluating candidates’ qualifications thoroughly to ensure the best fit for the role.

05:12Others on the council pushed for appointing an internal candidate, highlighting the successful track record of the acting city managers during their interim tenure. They questioned the necessity of a formal search. This group raised concerns about the time and cost associated with an external search, arguing it could delay important city initiatives.

Ultimately, the majority of the council agreed on the need for an open search to ensure a broad and competitive pool of candidates. The motion to engage a search firm was made, with assurances that the process would be expedited to avoid unnecessary delays. The council members committed to participating in the process, acknowledging that appointing a city manager is their sole hiring responsibility.