Bloomington Port Authority Approves Subcontractor Agreements for Parking Ramp Construction

The Bloomington Port Authority Commission approved agreements with two subcontractors for the construction of a parking ramp. Additionally, the Commission introduced a new Assistant Port Authority Administrator and discussed the need for clearer operational definitions for mixed-use developments.

At the forefront of the meeting was the approval of service agreements for subcontractors SDI Signs and RTL Construction, Inc., essential for the construction of the parking ramp associated with phase two of the SIC project. The Commission voted unanimously to authorize these agreements. The approved contracts amount to $54,131.65 for SDI Signs and $72,798 for RTL Construction, Inc. The Commission also granted a 10% contingency for unforeseen conditions.

Questions were raised about why these specific subcontractors were not included in the initial package of subcontractors. The response clarified that the scopes of work for signage and installation/drywall were deferred to later stages, and thus presented separately.

The meeting also included the introduction of Kevin Kenny as the new Assistant Port Authority Administrator, focused on development and redevelopment. Kenny, who has an extensive background in urban planning and real estate development, expressed his enthusiasm for contributing to the community where he was raised. His prior experience includes roles at the City of Minneapolis and Minnesota Housing, among others.

Another important topic was the discussion on mixed-use developments. The minutes from a previous discussion on the Cross Andersen project were revised to better reflect the Commission’s deliberations. It was emphasized that there is a need for more operational definitions and clearer guidelines for mixed-use developments to provide developers with a comprehensive understanding of the Commission’s vision and requirements.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: