Public comments revealed a consistent theme of frustration with the perceived lack of transparency and responsiveness from the council regarding the financial management of city resources. Several residents, including Jeff Johnson and Shelley Karis, articulated their struggles with substantial tax hikes, which were seen as unsustainable, especially for those on fixed incomes. Johnson emphasized the burden of a $410 increase in property tax, while Karis questioned the calculations used to justify her 14.6% tax increase.

The discussion also touched on the city’s budgeting process, with residents like Jonathan Banks criticizing the shift to priority-based budgeting, which they argued did not translate into actual spending reductions. Banks called for a more transparent explanation of the budget, particularly the justification for maintaining certain city departments amidst rising costs. The sentiment was echoed by others who expressed skepticism about the city’s fiscal strategy, particularly regarding the necessity and impact of certain expenditures.

Amidst these concerns, the council addressed the 2026 property tax levy, which had initially been proposed with a 17.92% increase, later refined to 7.48%. Budget Manager Corey Carlson outlined adjustments that led to this reduction, including lower debt service expenses and increased permit revenues. Despite these efforts, public commenters like Frank Lowe and John Ho Mock continued to question the adequacy of the council’s response to residents’ concerns about rising taxes, urging the council to consider the broader impact on the community.

Another topic was the allocation of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, which had been delayed due to pandemic-related issues. The council aimed to redirect $230,000 towards affordable housing rehabilitation, addressing concerns about the underutilization of these funds. A council member questioned the delay, emphasizing the importance of leveraging available resources to prevent the funds from reverting back to the federal government.

The council also deliberated on a proposed ordinance regarding small business refuse enclosures, designed to lower barriers for business operations. The ordinance sought to allow exterior refuse enclosures across all zoning districts, with performance standards to ensure compliance. While generally supported, the ordinance prompted discussions about potential future conflicts as land use density changes within the city.

A proposed compensation plan for city employees further fueled debate. The plan featured a standard 4% annual raise for all employees, regardless of performance, sparking concerns about its financial sustainability and effectiveness. Council members expressed reservations about proceeding without a comprehensive understanding of the plan’s implications.