08:35The most pressing topic was the approval of a yield plan base count calculation, which the board determined to be 34 units after confirming that eight lots could accommodate two units each. This decision followed a review of the stormwater narrative and open space requirements, with the board ensuring alignment on lot calculations. A key aspect of the discussion was the open space requirement, which involved analysis of the proposed development area’s calculations. It was noted that the proposed open space was 263,587 square feet, compared to the building development area of 242,623 square feet. Members emphasized the importance of transparency and accuracy, particularly in regard to steep slope calculations and their impact on open space determination.

17:59Another central theme was the classification of a right of way and whether it could be considered part of the open space. Ownership and the implications of including this area in calculations were under scrutiny, with the potential for adjustments as new information emerged from the town council. The discussion revealed concerns about the infiltration basin and its exclusion from open space calculations.

27:29The meeting also addressed the inclusion of utility infrastructure within designated open space areas, which some members felt could contravene local bylaws. This included deliberations on a 30-foot-wide utility easement and extensive excavation work involving the installation of “hundreds of feet of 24-inch pipe.” The potential impact of such infrastructure on the integrity of the open space was a concern, with calls for a waiver to address the unique circumstances of this project. Clarification was sought regarding the calculations used to determine compliance with open space requirements, emphasizing the need for precise and reliable data.

13:58Public input further highlighted the complexities of defining open space, with residents questioning the appropriateness of including areas like impervious surfaces and utility installations within open space calculations. Concerns were voiced about the potential ecological impact of the development, particularly in terms of stormwater management and its effect on local habitats.

58:17As the meeting continued, the focus shifted to a stormwater request for proposal (RFP) prepared in collaboration with the town engineer, aimed at ensuring examination of the proposed stormwater systems. There was consensus on the need for a third-party review to provide additional scrutiny. Public comments emphasized the importance of this review, citing previous projects where peer evaluations had led to significant improvements in project outcomes.

01:23:16The board also addressed other ongoing projects, including those at Park Street and Stratton Hill, where challenges related to tree clearing and erosion controls were discussed. These projects highlighted the logistical difficulties associated with development work and the necessity for careful monitoring to ensure compliance with safety and environmental standards. The committee emphasized the importance of regular inspections and transparency throughout these processes.