- Filters
- NJ
- Essex County
- 10/21/25
- 10/22/2025
- 61 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Livingston Town Planning Board meeting focused primarily on the proposal by Swim Quest LLC for a large, illuminated sign on its building on South Livingston Avenue. Concerns regarding the sign’s size, visibility, and potential impact on the area’s aesthetic dominated the discussions, leading to a decision to revisit and possibly revise the proposal in a subsequent meeting.
- FL
- Osceola County
- 10/21/25
- 10/21/2025
- 112 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The St. Cloud Planning Commission meeting focused on various development proposals, with attention given to traffic concerns related to the Harvest Grove and Nova Road Community Center projects.
- MA
- Bristol County
- 10/21/25
- 10/22/2025
- 118 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During its recent meeting, the Norton Planning Board approved a modification to a special permit for Al Nylam Pharmaceuticals, allowing for the expansion of their facility on Commerce Way. The meeting also addressed commercial operation hours, open meeting law complaints, and several subdivision-related issues.
- MA
- Hampden County
- 10/21/25
- 10/21/2025
- 51 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The East Longmeadow Planning Board meeting on October 21, 2025, focused on development proposals, particularly the approval of site plans for two commercial projects on Shaker Road. This included a 1,575-square-foot addition to a non-conforming structure and a new 5,740-square-foot office building, both of which received crucial approvals despite debates over parking waivers and traffic management.
- FL
- Seminole County
- 10/21/25
- 10/21/2025
- 24 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Oviedo Local Planning Agency approved a deviation request for a property on Clark Street, allowing the property owner to maintain and potentially redevelop an existing detached garage that does not meet current setback requirements. The decision involves a property located within the downtown neighborhood zoning district, earmarked for future lot splits and development.