- Filters
- MA
- Bristol County
- 4/22/25
- 04/22/2025
- 85 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During a recent Westport Planning Board meeting, the board made strides in advancing solar energy initiatives and discussed potential redevelopment plans for the old high school building. In addition to addressing these topics, the board reviewed ongoing projects, grant applications, and procedural matters.
- MA
- Essex County
- 4/22/25
- 04/22/2025
- 102 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Danvers Planning Board approved a special permit for a new indoor pickleball facility on Endicott Street during its April 22, 2025, meeting, while also engaging in discussions about the implications of MBTA zoning regulations on local development. Board members expressed support for the pickleball project, citing potential community benefits, and voiced concerns over public misconceptions about zoning changes related to recent developments.
- NJ
- Morris County
- 4/22/25
- 04/29/2025
- 72 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent Long Hill Township Planning Board meeting, updates were made to local regulations, including the alignment of pool fence requirements with the New Jersey state construction code and discussions on zoning changes, density regulations, and the categorization of business uses. These changes aim to streamline local ordinances and reflect contemporary needs.
- NJ
- Hudson County
- 4/22/25
- 04/28/2025
- 160 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Jersey City Planning Board meeting on April 22, 2025, saw the approval of a cannabis retail facility on Tunnel Avenue. The facility, operated by Grass House LLC, received unanimous approval following a detailed presentation on its operations and security measures.
- MA
- Suffolk County
- 4/22/25
- 04/22/2025
- 219 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: At the Chelsea Planning Board meeting, discussions were dominated by a proposed residential and commercial development at 105 and Park Street, 12 Essex Street, and Ellsworth Street. Residents expressed concerns over parking, the project’s scale, and its impact on the community, particularly its potential to exacerbate existing parking and traffic issues. The project aims to replace current structures with a 120-unit building featuring predominantly one-bedroom apartments, which residents argue do not meet local housing needs. Concerns about affordable housing and community character were raised, emphasizing the need for family-sized housing units.