Bogota School Board Plans for Future Without Raising Taxes

In a move for the Bogota School District, the local tax levy will remain unchanged, resulting in no tax increase for the upcoming 2024-2025 budget. This fiscal decision came during the recent Bogota School Board meeting, which also saw discussions on various district initiatives, including special education funding, technology upgrades, and community programs.

The meeting delved into the 2024-2025 budget, a topic given its direct impact on the district’s educational programs and taxpayers. The Superintendent outlined the budget drivers, such as staffing needs, curriculum requirements, capital maintenance, and special education costs. Notably, the budget presentation highlighted building upgrades, professional development, and interventions to support struggling students while maintaining the local tax levy at its current rate.

This includes a 3.22% salary increase for administrators, central office staff, and maintenance workers, alongside a projected 13.5% rise in benefits cost. The Appropriations breakdown showed allocations of 25% for instruction, 18% for special education, and 11% for tuition. Pie charts were used to illustrate the distribution of revenue sources and board appropriations.

In terms of the district’s achievements, the one-to-one Chromebook initiative, replenishment of educational resources, and the installation of cyber security measures were deemed significant. The board celebrated the successful investment of referendum capital in New Jersey, which generated close to $1 million, contributing to the ability to keep taxes steady for the upcoming school year.

Further district accomplishments included the completion of five years of free schooling for Bogota students, the success of an 18 to 21-year-old program, and a hydroponic gardening project. The board also highlighted collaborations with Fairleigh Dickinson University on STEM programs and Bergen Academy for an engineering partnership.

The meeting also addressed the receipt of various grants for district-wide security improvements, high-impact tutoring, and school-based mental health support. The board noted the district’s recognition for outstanding financial reporting for six consecutive years and the successful negotiation of contracts with administrators and the board office.

During the public comment section, community members expressed appreciation for the Middle School track’s approval, inquiring about the timeline for field construction. The board responded that bids were in progress and completion was hoped for by October. Concerns regarding the readiness of the football field were met with assurances of a backup plan and ongoing discussions to minimize disruptions to the football schedule. Additionally, questions about student enrollment, tuition rates, and the number of special needs students placed out of the district were addressed, with the board providing specific details.

The special education budget was a notable subject, with the cost of special education programs discussed in detail. Estimates put the total cost for special education at around $3.2 million, which is 7% of the budget. The board was commended for their work in this area, and efforts were highlighted to bring more programs and students back to the district. Concerns about the potential impact of recreational fields on pollution and health were also raised, with specific reference to the importance of conserving large trees.

The re-registration process for students was another topic of concern, with approximately 500 people registered at the time of the meeting, and efforts were being made to increase this number. The upcoming review of teacher aides was mentioned, emphasizing the need for fair and transparent communication within the community.

The board also took a moment of silence to honor a former member who had passed away. During the public comments, there was a discussion on the value of trees in relation to real estate and a request for increased tree planting.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly: