A primary focus of the meeting was Massachusetts General Brigham’s application under pathway two, concerning their on-site combined heat and power plants located in Environmental Justice neighborhoods. The board examined the complexities of decarbonizing these facilities, given their reliance on CO2-emitting fuels. MGB representatives, including John and Dennis, outlined their ongoing efforts to transition towards renewable energy, noting that 80% of their electricity already comes from renewable sources. They are developing a decarbonization master plan, anticipated to be completed by summer, which includes strategies such as electrification and energy consumption reduction per square foot. However, they acknowledged the challenge posed by a long-term contract with their current energy provider, extending until 2051.

The board discussed the prioritization of decarbonization efforts, with an emphasis on Environmental Justice areas. MGB confirmed that most of their properties are located in these neighborhoods. The board members praised MGB’s integration of health data and air quality impacts into their planning but inquired about the dissemination of health-related findings to the public. MGB mentioned an internal group studying these impacts, which could guide broader community health initiatives.

Financial concerns also surfaced, with board members inquiring about funding sources such as the Inflation Reduction Act. MGB is exploring potential tax incentives and working with state resources to address the financial pressures of decarbonization.

Another topic was the city’s building portfolio, presented by Chris Kramer. The portfolio consists of 369 city-owned buildings, with current emissions reported at 77,000 metric tons of CO2—16% below the 2025-2029 threshold. The city has implemented several energy efficiency initiatives, including 20 active combined heat and power (CHP) units in 16 city schools, contributing to electricity savings and reduced grid stress during peak demand. Nonetheless, the mayor’s executive order on fossil fuel reduction has introduced ambiguity in the long-term plans for these CHP units, particularly concerning their end-of-life strategy.

The board also explored the city’s engagement with Boston Public Schools (BPS), focusing on integrating green jobs and skills into the curriculum. They discussed potential collaborations between contractors involved in decarbonization projects and BPS students.

The meeting included a presentation by the Community Builders, who manage ten residential buildings within Environmental Justice and non-EJ areas. Their Community Life model connects residents with resources and support for decarbonization. However, the organization faces challenges in achieving Net Zero compliance due to their reliance on public funding. They are navigating competitive funding sources and exploring options under the Inflation Reduction Act to support their decarbonization efforts.

Board members expressed appreciation for the engagement of community stakeholders and the emphasis on resident input in capital projects. They highlighted the need for clarity in decarbonization planning, especially concerning cost implications for low- and moderate-income residents. The discussion included suggestions for exploring solar energy to mitigate rising electricity costs, particularly for common areas.

In administrative updates, the board was informed about the Building Decarbonization Advisor Program, selecting 22 building owners for free decarbonization planning services. Future workshops aim to continue engaging building owners across neighborhoods. Additionally, a proposal to forgo the next review meeting was accepted, allowing city staff more time to review applications, with the next meeting scheduled for February 10th.