Councilors articulated the necessity of revising Boston’s complex zoning code, which currently hinders the construction of multi-unit housing in many neighborhoods. Sharon Durkan, chair of the Planning Development and Transportation Committee, underscored the importance of aligning zoning practices with contemporary housing needs. She pointed out that triple-deckers, a staple of Boston’s housing landscape, remain illegal in much of the city. By legalizing these structures, Boston could increase housing density near transit areas, fostering affordability and accessibility.

This stark statistic underscores the mismatch between Boston’s existing housing stock and the regulatory framework, creating unnecessary hurdles for homeowners seeking to make property improvements.

Councilor Henry Santana emphasized the role of ADUs in addressing housing needs, particularly for intergenerational living and caregiving. He noted that while Mattapan currently permits ADUs by right, a citywide policy is essential to meet diverse community needs. Councilor Enrique Pepén echoed these sentiments, highlighting the cultural significance of triple-deckers and the historical barriers faced by families, particularly those of color, in accessing such housing.

Council members discussed the importance of community engagement in developing zoning policies. The council also explored historical zoning practices, recognizing their roots in discriminatory policies that have long impeded housing equity.

In tandem with zoning reform, the council considered strategies to streamline the permitting process for ADUs. Efforts to simplify this process include a newly developed educational guidebook available at Boston Public Library branches and online, which offers practical advice for homeowners interested in constructing ADUs. The Boston Home Center has also been active in providing financial assistance, although the high costs of construction in the city remain a significant obstacle.

Beyond zoning and ADUs, the council addressed the broader implications of housing policy, including the need to balance housing development with community stability. Discussions included the potential use of older buildings for lodging houses, providing solutions for low-income residents and those in recovery.

Additionally, the meeting touched on the issue of parking in the context of increased housing density. Some councilors argued for a reevaluation of parking minimums. The need to integrate housing with green spaces and maintain the urban forest was also emphasized.

The session concluded with a recognition of the importance of ongoing community engagement and the need for policies that reflect the diverse needs of Boston’s residents. The council acknowledged that the road to comprehensive housing reform is complex and multifaceted, requiring collaboration between city officials, community members, and housing experts.