The proposal for 562 East 5th Street, presented by Attorney Ryan Spitz and the development team, aimed to maintain the existing historic structure while constructing a new addition. Despite zoning violations concerning parking and rear yard setbacks, the project received unanimous approval from the board. The development is expected to contribute to the city’s initiative to reduce car dependency. Spitz emphasized that the project aligned with planning goals for medium-density housing and had undergone discussions with the Landmarks Commission regarding its design. Community feedback highlighted concerns over parking and density, but adjustments, including setbacks and design modifications, were made to address these issues.

In another major discussion, the board examined a proposed redevelopment on Fenway, which has remained largely vacant since the 1980s. The project aimed to convert the building into a five-unit multifamily dwelling with various sizes and configurations of units. Despite support for restoring the property, community members, represented by the Fenway Civic Association and Fenway Forward, raised concerns about the scale of additions and future use, particularly regarding short-term rentals and student housing. A representative from the project emphasized the applicants’ commitment to long-term residential use and the exclusion of short-term rentals. The board approved the project with provisions for further review by the Boston Water and Sewer Commission and the planning department, acknowledging the need for careful oversight in the groundwater conservation overlay district.

Attention also turned to a development proposal on Dell Avenue, where architect Anthony Mackey presented plans for renovating a historic four-unit building. The project included adding rear and side porches, a head house, and roof decks. The community had shown support for the renovation, and the Office of Neighborhood Services confirmed a backing from an abutters meeting. The board approved the project unanimously, noting the importance of maintaining community engagement throughout the process.

During the meeting, the board addressed 170 Popular Street, where Thomas Tun, a co-owner, proposed eliminating a steep internal staircase and enclosing part of the roof to increase living space. The project received community support, and the board approved it without opposition after confirming the completion of the necessary community process.

The board also discussed a proposal on Royal Street and Empire Street to construct two three-family houses on vacant lots. Adjustments were made based on community input, including increasing open space. The board approved the project, emphasizing the importance of meeting accessibility requirements.

In an ongoing effort to ensure community involvement, the board deferred several cases, including those for 180-182 Savin Hill Avenue and 567-577 Adams Street, to address concerns raised by community members and allow for further discussions and planning reviews.