0:03The Commission’s public hearing began with Jack Halverson from the planning department presenting the amendment’s benefits. The proposal, which has already received unanimous approval from the city council, seeks to remove outdated zoning barriers, thereby encouraging housing development without altering existing dimensional regulations. Halverson emphasized that the amendment would particularly benefit the conversion of office spaces into residential units.

Councilor Durkin elaborated on the amendment’s potential impact, highlighting the historical context of the Bullfinch Triangle’s transformation from an industrial area to a revitalized district poised for growth. She noted the numerous underutilized spaces within the district, including 11 open surface parking lots, which could be repurposed for housing. Durkin stressed the need for a diverse, mixed-use neighborhood that supports economic development, asserting that increased housing would benefit both residents and businesses.

The proposal received strong support from local businesses and community organizations, as well as developers eager to convert properties for residential use but deterred by existing regulatory hurdles. Durkin addressed community concerns regarding lodging or boarding houses included in the proposed residential definitions, arguing for the flexibility these uses offer in catering to workforce and senior housing needs.

12:07During the Commission’s discussion, a typographical error in the original zoning language was identified, specifically the term “conversation” instead of “conversion.” The proponent clarified that this typo had been corrected prior to the city council’s approval.

Public testimony revealed mixed sentiments regarding the amendment. Dan Jaff, a Charlestown resident, expressed concerns about potential overdevelopment leading to a loss of character in the West End and the risk of displacing middle and lower-class residents. Meanwhile, Carol Matika, president of the West End Civic Association, expressed gratitude for the amendment’s potential to address housing needs, acknowledging concerns about housing types and zoning requirements while committing to ongoing monitoring of development in the area.

Following the public comments, proponents reiterated that the amendment would not alter existing height restrictions but would change housing from a conditional to an allowed use, framing it as a strategy for smart growth and preservation. A Commissioner raised a query about affordable housing provisions, which was addressed by clarifying that new developments must meet affordable housing requirements, applicable to projects exceeding a specific unit threshold.

Ultimately, the Commission voted to approve the text amendment with seven affirmative votes and one recusal. The chair congratulated Councilor Durkin on the successful passage of the amendment.