The central issue revolved around a proposed ordinance that would prioritize residents for beach locker rentals, potentially disenfranchising approximately 200 non-resident holders. This elicited passionate responses from several community members who argued that the move would violate the public trust doctrine, which mandates that beach access remain open to all. Concerns were raised about the potential legal challenges the ordinance might face, with references made to case law and existing legal standards that have not traditionally extended the doctrine to include beach lockers. The borough attorney explained that while municipalities must provide necessary amenities like parking and bathrooms, lockers do not fall under this requirement, aligning the proposed ordinance with legal precedents.

Non-resident beach locker holders voiced strong opposition, emphasizing their long-standing ties to Bradley Beach and their contributions to the local economy. Several speakers shared personal stories of their families’ historical connections to the area. The council was urged to consider a grandfather clause to allow current non-resident locker holders to maintain access while preventing new non-resident rentals.

The debate extended to the financial implications of restricting locker access. One speaker highlighted the potential economic impact of limiting locker access, arguing that non-residents contribute to local businesses, particularly along Main Street. Suggestions were made to expand locker access or create a tiered fee structure to accommodate both residents and non-residents.

The council deliberated on various proposals, including the possibility of expanding locker availability and exploring alternative winter storage solutions. The practicality of increasing locker numbers was weighed against logistical challenges and the need for careful management of beach utility revenues. The discussion acknowledged the complexities of balancing residents’ needs with the contributions of non-residents, emphasizing the need for further research and data collection to inform decision-making.

In addition to the locker debate, parking issues also dominated the meeting. Residents expressed concerns over proposed changes to parking ordinances, particularly the implications for non-primary residents and individuals with disabilities. A proposed increase in the annual application fee for special parking permits from $50 to $200 was met with resistance, with attendees arguing that the financial burden on disabled residents was excessive compared to neighboring municipalities. The council considered suggestions to improve parking management, such as simplifying signage and reviewing the criteria for issuing permits.

Public comments revealed a clear divide between prioritizing residents for beach lockers and recognizing the historical and economic ties of non-residents to Bradley Beach. The council was urged to reconsider the ordinance’s timeline and explore options that would not alienate any community segment. The meeting concluded with a motion to table the ordinance, allowing for further adjustments and community engagement before a final decision is made.