The meeting’s central topic was the approval of a variance request for a property on Chicago Avenue, which sought to split an existing parcel into two equal parcels for duplex construction. The property faced constraints, as the proposed lot size was 4,374 square feet—falling short of the minimum requirement of 5,000 square feet—with a frontage of 62.5 feet, exceeding the maximum allowed 60 feet. Additionally, a front yard setback of 13 feet was requested, deviating from the required 20 to 30 feet.

Staff recommended approving the variances, citing that the project would enhance residential density and align with the city’s comprehensive housing goals aimed at providing diverse housing options and promoting home ownership. The unique circumstances of the property, including an unusable smaller parcel, further justified the variances. The Planning Commission discussed the implications, particularly regarding the front yard setback and the building’s orientation facing Chicago Avenue. The city engineer’s rejection of the original driveway plan due to its proximity to an intersection necessitated a redesign.

During the public hearing, Jennifer Petri from Festar Home Improvement represented the applicants, noting that this duplex would be their first, although they had built multiple homes in the area. The commission deliberated on procedural matters, including whether it was common to have two variances associated with one fee, which staff confirmed. Questions also arose concerning the walkability of the area and potential future trail plans along 13th Street.

Following public comments, the commission deliberated on the variance request. Members expressed support, citing practical difficulties in accessing 13th Street and the alignment of the project with community needs. It was noted that the proposal exemplified infill development, essential for urban growth. Clarity was sought on the proposed design, confirming that the duplex would be linked by a garage. A motion to approve the variance request, incorporating staff recommendations, was made and seconded, leading to a unanimous vote in favor.

The commission then addressed unfinished business regarding building design standards. The discussion centered on garage setbacks within the Contemporary Neighborhood (CN1 and CN2) zoning districts. Members debated the implications of allowing garages to be built in front of residences versus adhering to a five-foot setback. Established neighborhoods like Northtown and Brainerd Oaks, operating under older ordinances permitting forward garages, were referenced. Some members suggested that contemporary designs could have garages positioned five feet in front, reflecting current home construction trends.

However, not all members agreed. Some expressed discomfort with “restoring the ability to put the garage forward,” arguing that the intent of the revised ordinance was to emphasize the residence over the garage. The practicality of building garages in line with homes versus in front was debated, with one member questioning whether it cost more. A builder in attendance responded that it likely cost less.

Concerns were raised about drainage and water runoff, particularly in relation to garage placement. The debate included various perspectives on the five-foot setback, with some advocating for a compromise. Ultimately, a motion to change the five-foot requirement to two feet was proposed and met with a divided vote. The motion failed initially but was reintroduced and passed in a subsequent vote, with most members in favor.

Further discussions focused on zoning regulations for the CN districts, including establishing a minimum lot size and adjusting side yard setbacks. The aim was to provide flexibility in lot sizes without necessitating a variance and to prevent unintended density outcomes from lot consolidations. The commission emphasized the need for balance between encouraging development and maintaining neighborhood integrity.

Accessory dwelling units (ADUs) were another significant topic. The commission discussed the owner-occupied requirement for ADUs and reached a consensus to strike this requirement, allowing further exploration of these units. This decision aimed to address potential density issues and ensure that homeowner occupancy regulations did not disrupt the existing framework around short-term rentals.

The meeting also covered design standards for single-family detached residential structures and multifamily housing. Proposals included eliminating the requirement for the primary entrance to match the orientation of other buildings along the block and enhancing facades with architectural features such as porches or covered entries. The commission sought flexibility in design requirements to avoid monotony and maintain aesthetic appeal.

Commercial use design standards were also debated, particularly prohibiting metal siding with exposed fasteners in commercial districts. The focus was on ensuring aesthetically pleasing materials and maintaining a positive visual landscape.

The meeting concluded with updates on recent actions taken by the city council, including the approval of a garage ordinance and regulations concerning outdoor storage and crypto mining. The resignation of two planning commissioners was announced, and a community event, the Touch-a-Truck and Flapjack Festival, was promoted.