08:02The council scrutinized the qualifications of four tier one candidates. Candidate evaluations were based on experience, education, and relevant skills. Candidate two, who currently serves as an assistant city administrator, emerged as the top choice. This candidate’s ten years of experience and strong background in finance, project management, and planning and zoning were highlighted. The second finalist, candidate three, has been a city manager for 3.5 years, with previous program management experience in education. The desire for a better work-life balance was cited as a reason for seeking a position closer to family. The third finalist, candidate four, has 4.5 years of direct administrative experience and a law degree, although not licensed, and was noted for managing multiple roles in a smaller community.

08:35The candidates were assessed through a scoring system, with council members ranking their preferences. The results placed candidate two as the top choice, with candidate three slightly behind. Candidate four was selected as the third finalist. Additionally, candidates one and five were chosen as alternates, should any of the top three finalists withdraw from consideration.

17:46The council also discussed logistics for the next step in the hiring process, agreeing to conduct interviews on the afternoon of May 14th. Members confirmed their availability. The council expressed optimism about the candidate pool, hoping to finalize the selection soon.