A significant portion of the meeting was devoted to the resignation of City Administrator David Chansky. The City Attorney, Joel Langle, presented Chansky’s resignation, which cited an unsafe, unhealthy, or hostile work environment. The resignation, effective September 7, included a proposed separation agreement stipulating termination benefits and a waiver of claims against the city. The council debated the acceptance of this resignation and the associated financial implications.

One council member raised concerns about the lack of concrete evidence supporting Chansky’s claim of a hostile work environment, questioning the basis for the resignation and expressing opposition to spending over $100,000 without substantial backing for Chansky’s allegations. “I have no understanding or information otherwise that that was the case,” the council member stated, emphasizing financial responsibility towards taxpayers.

Another council member pointed out the potential legal risks if Chansky’s resignation was accepted without acknowledging his claims. The City Attorney clarified that the employment agreement allowed Chansky to resign under the claim of a hostile work environment, which could trigger termination benefits and reduce litigation risks for the city. This led to a division within the council, with some members stressing the need for a smooth transition to avoid operational disruptions, while others called for further investigation into the allegations.

The debate also touched on historical precedents for separation agreements with past administrators. Some members argued that past arrangements typically included benefits upon separation. The council considered scheduling a special meeting to address the separation agreement more thoroughly, weighing the legal implications and the city’s pressing budgetary obligations.

The meeting also featured an extensive discussion on the city’s preliminary budget for 2025. City Administrator Chansky detailed the budget, explaining the calculation of the tax levy and the allocation of funds across various departments. The proposed preliminary levy for 2025 was $3.385 million, representing a 5.4% increase from the previous year, with a preliminary tax rate of 35.10%, a decrease from 2024. Chansky highlighted the impact on individual property taxes, noting that a property valued at $350,000 would see city property taxes of approximately $1,228.51, a decrease if the property’s value remained unchanged.

The budget breakdown showed significant allocations to public safety (46%), public works (21%), administration (12%), land use planning and zoning (7%), parks (2%), and other governmental expenses (12%). Chansky addressed considerations discussed during the budget workshop, including capital improvements, training, and general cost increases. The council deliberated on the implications of bonding for projects versus using cash payments, reflecting on the financial strategy for the city’s future expenditures.

Public comments brought attention to community safety concerns. Resident Terry Scherg submitted a petition requesting a speed study on several roads due to traffic from a nearby compost yard. Scherg emphasized the safety risks posed by large commercial vehicles, calling for the posting of 25 mph speed limit signs and restricted operating hours for the compost yard. The council supported the need for further investigation, discussing the allocation of funds for additional digital speed signs and the necessity of a citywide speed study.

The council also addressed various budgetary considerations, including animal control agreements, building maintenance, and capital fund transfers. Discussions included the transition to a new impound services provider, the allocation of funds for police department building repairs, and the need for a master plan for the ongoing development of a disc golf course.

A proposal for a speed study plan, influenced by Chief Sendell and Public Works Supervisor Zeran, was discussed, with a consensus to conduct the study in the fall for accurate data collection. The council approved a motion to accept the petition for the speed study around the compost site area.

Community contributions were acknowledged, including a proposal for the donation of a sign for the disc golf course and the relocation of a Pavilion as part of the city hall remodel. The relocation options included moving the Pavilion to a basketball court area or donating it to Eagle View Elementary School, with the Parks committee tasked with making an informed decision.

The meeting concluded with logistical discussions about scheduling a workshop to address camping on public property, animal control issues, and cannabis licensing. The council planned for an open house to engage property owners impacted by the Bushman Road project and discussed the timing of a groundbreaking ceremony for the City Hall project.